Alka Rani v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 20 Oct 2008
- Bench
- M M KUMAR, JORA SINGH
Outcome
Disposed of
Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the digest? M.M KUMAR, J. The subject matter of challenge in the instant writ petition is order dated 24.2.2007 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Market Committee, Jagadhari-respondent no.4.…
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH * * * * * Present: Mr. R.S Budhwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for respondent no.1. Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for respondents no. 2 to 4. * * * * *
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgement?
Operative part
To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the digest? M.M KUMAR, J. The subject matter of challenge in the instant writ petition is order dated 24.2.2007 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Market Committee, Jagadhari-respondent no.4. It is undisputed position that against the aforementioned order, a remedy of appeal under Section CWP No. 3302 of 2008 2 40 of the Punjab Agriculture Marketing Produce Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act') is available and the petitioner has not availed of that remedy. In fact, even the remedy of revision has also been provided under Section 42 of the Act. Accordingly, the petitioner is relegated to the statutory remedy of appeal and revision. Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( M.M KUMAR ) JUDGE October 20, 2008 ( JORA SINGH ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 20 Oct 2008. The bench was M M KUMAR, JORA SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.