I l v. St at eofHaryaa and ot hers

GeneralHaryanaassist edby Shri Sanj eevBansal Advocat e on inst ruct ionsfrom Mr AnuragRast ogiDirect or Secondary Educat ion Haryana very fairly st at es t hat t he wit hdrew t he prospect us111 t hey will issue fresh C 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 r 0 0 I CD Z 2 r I 08 a0 a Z CL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t t 1 1 1 Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 4 1 1 1 I e I l 1 r 44 1 1 1 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 j 1 f 1 e t m D 0 01 t 5 I t Z r 1 CO er3 Z D Qm 1 1 f65 Non 17449of2008 Eeconnect edpet it ions 6 1 r prospect usifneed be I t is lrt herst at edt hat in case Governm ent decidest o holdt het est m oved byall t hecandidat esin respectt o t he earlierprospect usissued shall be consideredvalid and t heyneed not applyafresh Pet it ioners if so advised m ay applyagainin t hat event fee alreadypaidby t hem shall be adj ust et I n Vlew t he st at em ent m ade t his writ pet it ion 1 becom e inuct uous and t he sam e 1S Pet it ioners if so advised m ay laychallenget o t he not ificat ion now issued by t he Governm enteffect ingam endm ent in t he serVlCe 8 Again a prospect ushas been issued by t he Board of School Educat ion HaryanaBhiwani in referencet o not iflcat ionsdat ed17A2008 and 242008 issued by t he St at e of Haryana I n t he prospect usit has been specificallym ent ionedt hat passingof t he Eligibilit yTest would be an essent ial condit ion for recruit m ent of all t eachers The prospect usalso cont am s t he schelne of t est syllabusfor Eligibilit yTest of different of t eachersschedule and eligibilit ycrit eria et c The last dat e of receiptof for Eligibilit yTest s was fixed as 1982008 The Eligibilit yTest s for differentcat egoryof t eachersVlZ Heads Teachers Lect urers and Mast erslMist resseswere scheduled t o be held on different dat esbet ween 4102008 t o 12102008 exure Pa69 9e i 91 1 I t 1 here t hat t he St at e of Haryanahas been advert isingvarious post sof t eachersSom t im et o t im e Accordingt o t he pet it ionersone such advert isem entwas issued on 2072006 6AnnexurePe79 Som e of t he pet it ionersand ot her sim ilarlysit uat ed 1 persons were eligibiefor respect ivepost sas pr t he qualiflcat ionsprescribedln t he said advert isem ent Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 1 1 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 166 1wpNo 17449of2008 connect edpet it ions 7 C However t he could not be m ade beeauseof lit igat ionwhich had beengoingon 111Honble t heHighCourt as also Honble t he Coult However wit h t he adventofpassingofEligibit yTest as an essent ialcondit ion suchpersonsincludingt he havebeenrenderedineligible 10 I t is in t he of abovefact ualposit iont hat t he flled CWP No 17449of2008 However aft er issuanceofnot ice ofm ot ion and filingof replyby t he in pursuance t o a sent by t he Educat ion Haryanat heHaryanaSt aff Select ionCom m ission or brevit yt he 1382009 invit ing has issueda freshadvert isem entNo 412009dat ed for fillingup 9647 post sofJBT Teachers 1276 post sof Science Mast ers 237 post sof DPE Mast ers 1037 post s of Mat h Mast ers 372 post sof SS Mast ers 20 post sof Music Mast ersand 4 post sof Hom e ScienceMist resses The lastdat eofsubm ission form swas 148009 I n t he said advert isem entpassingof Eligibilit yTest has been m ent ionedas an essent ial t o t he said post s Annexure P I n order t o lay t o t he said advert isem entt he pet it ionersam endedt he writ pet it ion 11 The prim ary t he is t hat t he act ion of t he official t hecondit ion of passingof Eligibilit yTest is lll cont ravent ionof t he prescribedunder t he fram ed by t he Nat ional Council for TeachersEducat ion or brevit yNCTE has been const it ut edand est ablishedunder t he Nat ional Council for Teachers Educat ion Act 1993 or brevit yt he 1993 Act l Referringt o Sect ion 12 of t he 1993 Act it has been t hat NCTE has been est ablished for 1 Q 0 0 C0 I 4r Z 2 I 08 C m uo Z r ensunng plannedand coordinat ed t eacher educat ion and for det erm inat ionand m aint enanceof st andardsfor t eacher educat ion Sect ion12 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 467 No 17449of2008 85connect edpet it ions 8 Cl lrt her lnct ions oft he NCTE and clot hed it wit h t he power t o lay in respectof m inim um for a person t o be as a t eacherin schoolsor inst it ut ions NCTE also lays down norm s for any speciedcat egoryof courses in t eacher educat ionincludingt he m inim umeligibilit ycrit eria for adm ission t hereofand t hem et hod of select ion of candidat esdurat ion of t he course course cont ent s and m ode of curriculum I t has also t he power t o m inim um for a person t o be as a t eacherunder clause 6d9of Sect ion12 ft he Act Accordingt o t he Body inasm uch t he NCTE is like an Apex as wit hout it s recognit ionin t erm sof Sect ion 14 of t he 1993 Act inst it ut ioncould even st art any new course t rainingit eachers educat ion 12 I t has furt herbeen highlight edt hat under clause Ot i9 of Sul sect ion629of Sect ion 32 readwit h Sect ion 12600oft he 1993Act t heNCTE has fram ed nam elyt he Nat ional Council for Teacher Educat ion Minim um for Recruit m entof Teachers1r1 2001 6forbrevit yt he 2001 which cam e int o operat ionwef 492001 The 2001 recruit m entof t eachers in all form al schools est ablished run or ided or recognizedby t he Cent ral or St at eGovem m ent s and ot her aut horit ies for educat ion at elem ent ary schooO seniol secondaryst ageslRegWat ion3 providesfor 1 for recruit m ent of t eachersin educat ional inst it ut ions as givenin First and Second Schedule t o t he Regulat ionsI t has 8lrt her been st at edt hatt he qualificat ionsprescribedin t he First Schedule applyfor recruilt m ent oft eachers for t eachingschool subj ect swhereast he qualificat ionsprescribedin t he Second 1 1 m 4n 0 0 I C5 m dm II Il 1 1 Zt r 4 C 06 CO t Z 1 I l j 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l 1 1 10 1 1Il Il 1 1 1 1 Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 4 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 0 17449of2008 85connect edpet it ions 9 i C 9149 4W 11 Scheduleapply 1 1 1 i1 ecruit m entof t eachersfor PhysicalEdUcat iOe HOW for recruit m ent 1 et c exist ing 1 for coecurricularact ivit iessuch as work experience by t he concem ed applyFor from one level t o t henext 4 level of t eachingm lnlm um as given lI l t heSchedulesfor t he 1 level wouldbe 1 1 1 Basedupon 1 i t he 13 hasbeen asert ed t hat for 1 is Senior 1 in t he 2001 of Elem e School Cert ificat e Teacherst he or it s andDiplom a orCert iflcat ein Basic TeachersTrainingof a durat ion of not less t hant wo years or Elem ent aryEducat ion BPlEc For 1 6 t o t he post ofUprPrim aryTeacher6MiddleSchoolSect ion9t he Cert ificat eor Senior lt s 1S 1 1 l Dipl6m aor Cert iflcat elll 1 1 t TeachersTrainingof a durat ionof not less t han t wo years or BachelorElem ent aryEducat ion For t o t he postof SchoolTeacher t he is Graduat ewit hBachelorofEducat iot BdO or it s Four Years int eat ed BSc BEd course t o Senior Teacher t he Sim ilarlyfor 1S Degreeint he relevantsubj ectwit h Bachelorof Educat iorBFA9or it s For i 1 4 1 TwoYears i 1 ofPhysicalEducat ionI nst it ions rcruit m ent of t ea2hers l MSc BEd course 1 1 1 1 4 or an for Elem e Teacher is Senior SecondarySchool Cert ificat eor I nt erm ediat e l I t he orit s equivalentand Cert ificat ein PhysicalEducat ion CPEcl9 of a durat ionof 1 notless t han t wo years or School t he qualificat ion1S 1 I t it s For wit h Bachelor of PhysicalEducat ion Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 Y I 1 1 1 n2e106n I rl JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Q 0 0 I C5 Z r I 625 CJO 7Z Clw 1 1 1 1 1 C169 0a of2008 cect ed pet it ions 10 4ew fP7 1 1 11 BPEd9 or it s i Educat ionas an elect ivesubj ectt he and for 4 in Senior1 Physical 5 1 11 is MPElMPEd 14 4 The 2001 vide Nat ionalCouncil for TeacherEducat ion of Minim um for Recruit m ent of Teachers111 1 1 t he followingm lnlm um 2003 or brevit y t he 2003 e 1 1 i i 1 1 1 for recruit m ent of t eachers 1I 1 educat ional Minim um Academ ic 1 Level 1 1 1 PreSchoollNurseryFor childrenin t he age group of4 6yea 11 111 PreSchooll m a followedby flrSt Nursery le t WO form alschool 6forchildren in t he age yearsl 6 and 11 Ten Cert ificat e School Class it s in Prem Schoolt eacher educat ion program m e of a durat ionof not I esst han one year School Class Twelve I nt erm ediat e or Cert ificat e or it s wit h at 45I om arks and lI l t eacher educat ion of durat ionof program m e not less t han t wo years 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C 0 CO 1 t D I Z U2 C c6 r m Z Om 1 1 4 1 111 Elem ent ary a Prim ary le Senior or it s Cert ificat e or School 11 Diplom aor Cert iflcat e lt l basict eachers t rainingor a less t han durat ionof not t wo yearsn OR Bachelor of EI em ent ary Educat ionBEI Edl 0v8d4eSchool b Upper Prim ary le Senior Sect ion Cert ificat eor Secondwy I m erm ediat e1 1 1 reV1 43 1 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 1 1 h 1 1 e 24 1 Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t 1 1 1 1 40 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 4 10 0 C0 I C5 I Z 0 I 25 CQ vm o Z Qm i 1 1 r Y 1 1 4 17449of2008 8 connect edpet it ions CV700 47 11 J orit s 11e Diplom aor Cert iflcat e111 t eachers elem ent ary 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 t lVe of a durat ionof not lesst hant wo years Bachelor of Elem ent y OR Educat ion EI Ed9 OR wit h Bachelor of Educat ion6Bd it s School Educat ion6BFd or wit h Bachelor of it s Four BSc OR BEci course Senior I nt ennediat e PUC I 1 1 1 t Mast ers Degreein t he relevant ubj ect wit h Educat ion Bachelor of Edl Two MSc Ed Years it sOR course 1 1 course I l 15 Obviouslyt he NCTEhas not passingof Eligibilit yTest a t eacher in Secondaryor Senior Secondary for being 1 1 1 School cat egory I t has been Sry Rules t r 1 1 t hat due t o am endm entm ade in t he dat ed 2432008 t o P4 for Eligibilit yTestabout 150 lac candidat eshave been renderedas 1 ineligiblefor consideredand as t eacherswho are ot herwise eligibleas per t he fram ed by t he NCTE 1 Besides t his t he referredt o t he proviSiOnS of t he Const it ut ionand VW1OUS 1 f t he Suprem eCourt whichshall bedealt wit h by us in t he succeedingparaSl I nt h 160 1 1 Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 Y 1 I l st at em ent filed on behalfof offlcial Nos 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document elU e l 1 I e C171 0e 1 of2008 8 connect ed 12 CI J e 1 t o 5 1 r P 1 1 silbm issions average a t t 1 t hat every year on an havebeenm ade forrecruit m entof 5000t o 8000t eachersfor t he are lacs of degreeholderswho are 4 f i 1 1 t r 6 t 0 schoolsrun byt he Sit e ofHaryana passm g JBT r outfrom variousinst it ut ionsall overt heco 1 and BEd V wit h t he The qualit yof degreeholders passm gout from such aim edat 1 1 out t hat so Testis 2009 I t hasbeen t hat passingof t heEligibilit y of onlygoodqualit y I t has also been fart hreeEligibilit yTest s havebeen held in July2008 July candidat eshave passedsucht est e 2009andnearly r 1 1 Court in t he case of Basic 3 SCC 432 and t heir up beforeHonble t he Board UPe ve UpendraRai have upheldt he rightof t he St at e Govem m entln forvarious 1 ofNCTE on t he 1 am endedby 2003 academ ic eligibilit y for recruit m entof t eachers inst it ut ions aft er cat egoricalexam iningt he I t has been fram ed t hat t he 2001 by t he NCTE only m lnlm um 11 inst it ut ions Those 4 fort eacherst o be recruit edin different t he riglltof t he do not St at eGovem m entt o 1 1 addit ional of eligibilit ycrit ia for 21 1 1 forward t o seek 1 t eachersout of Moreover lacs of applint s who night t he basic com e t hat i t heNCTE liave riot been t or alt ered I t has t hus been t he b8sic passingof Test as an essent ial condit ion 1S onl t o select best t alent available I t has been deniedt hat any rat her t he St at e Govem m ent is st rivingt o recruit candidat ehas been bet t erqualit y for Govem m ent Schools of t he St at e of Haryana The Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 i t 0 1 1 4 1 t l 1 f 1 o J JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document r t 1 1 t r 0 C0 I CD 1 I Z I 05 OO V3 Z Om 1 1 1 1 1 1 CF1720 17449of2008 85connect edPet it ions S 4 1 e k 1 13 14 1df t 1 1 1 t 4 r 1 t m n t 0 0 I CD I Z e 4r 1 00 7 Z Qm 1 f I l 1 1 1 St at eofHaoanais niakingeveryeffolt t o fllI up vacant post sbyrecruit ingbest 1 t eacherst o m eet ut he exigencyI t has also been point edout t hat againstt he available17000vacanciesoft eachersnearly50000 STET passcandidat esare availablefor wit h t he HaryanaPublic Service 17 S 2001 I I n t he 1 t St affSelect ionCom m ission 1 filed byt he againt he have been reit erat edand it has been snit t ed oft he t hat oncet he 4 1 I l 1 NCTE has 1 1 1 t he m inim um for a persont o be as a t eacher at various 1 r levelsof Schooleducat iona person who possesssuch 1 be eliglblet o be a t eacher and nobodyhas t he 1 1 t o declare such a personineligibleI t hasbeen t hatbyvinue oft he no need for 1993Act t hereisuniformt rainingin Teacherseducat iont hereforet here 1 1 1 passingofeligibilit yt est All t he personswho possess are eligiblet o com pet eReferencehas also m adet o Rellat ion 40ft he 2001 t hat all 1 t he St at es 1 should1ng am endm entin t heir recruit m entrules in t erm s of t he 2001 1 40ft he 2001 readst husl Exi5t ingRecruit m entRules e1 m ay bem odifiedwit hin a periodof 3 year so as t o bringt hem in conform it ywit h t he in Schedule I n t he m eanwhile t eachers 1 1 xist ingRecruit m ent subsequentt o t he issue of will be requiredt o acquiret he e Per t hes in t he Schedule 1 18 1 I t hs t llrt her been ofHonble 1 t he Suprem eCourt in j udgm ent Rais case Csupra9is not applicablet o 1 1 Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 1 9 i 7 9 n 17 25 0 r 9 4 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document t 1 Y8Vo 17449of2008 8 connect edpet it ions L41 14 D 01 3 0 t he fact soft he presentcase Accordingt o t hemt he fram edbyt he 1 NCTE were t henot ice of Honble t he Suprem eCourt in t he saidcase 1 inform at ion I n par 23 of t he it has been on t he basisof r i 1 1 t he Rightt o I nform at ionAct 2005 t hatonly5I o V candidat eshave ablet o pass t he Eligibilit yTest on t heir own and t he were grnt edgracem arksenablingt hem t o passt he Eligibilit yTest 19 issue whichhas beenraisedin t he 81edby t he t hat t 1 guestt eacherswere earlier relaxat ionfrom t he Eligibilit yTest disallowed by Court However t he said relaxat ion has been 15000 workingt eachers ineligiblet o 1 i 1 1 for t he post st heyhad appliedfor I t has been t halch guestt eacherswould lose t heirj obswhenselect ionoft ealers on regularbasis t 1 wouldbe 20 Thelet it ionershave also filed addit ional inform at ion byfilingCM No 8139 of 2010placing on Exam inat ions 1 record t he st at ist ics wit h regardt o STET posit ionoft eachersas on 33010 6exures Pe10 8ap 1 19 Theyhave also placedon record a copy of t he Gazeue not iflcat ion by t he Minist ryof Law and Just ice Govem m ent of dat ed272009 1 1 1 V m Q 0 00 I CD 1 I l 1 Z 5r 0 r 08 CO m Z Om I ndia Rightof 1 Children t o Free and Educat ionAct 20096for t he 2009 Act has been not ified I t is pert inentt o m ent ion P t hat t he 2009 beenlegislat ecwit han obj ectt hat t he children oft he age 1 t 1 groupof6 t o 14 lears getSee and educat ionand it m e int o force 1A1010 Sect ion23 of t he 2009 Act prescribest he qualiflcat ionfor erm s and condit ions ofservice oft eachers and readst husl 123 I Qualificat ionsfor appoint m entand t erm s and condit ions of service of t eachers 619 person such m inim um Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 t n701e 2 I l 1 n7 nn 4I r l e 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 CTyNo17449 2008 connect edpet it ions 15 1 C 1 r b 1 i 1 Q 0 0 C5 I Z 0 I C45 Z CL 1 1 1 1 1 4 as laid down byan academ icaut horit yaut horisedby t he Cent ralGovem m ent by not i6cat i0n shall be eligiblefor 1 a t eacher 1 I l 429 Where a St at edoes not have adequat elnst it ut lons 1 1 offeringcourses t rainlng111 t eachereducat ionl or 4 t eachers possessingm inim um as laid down undei subwsect ion 919are notavaiI ablein sufflcient num bers t he Cent ralgovem m ent it deem snecessary by not iflcat ion relax t he m inim um a t eacher for such perionot exceeding8ve years as m aybe t 1 in t hat not ificat ionl 1 4 r r Providedt hat a t eacherwho at t he com m encem entof t his doesnot Act possessm inim um as laic down under subect ion19shallacquiresuch m inim um wit hin a 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 I n The salaryand allowances payablet o d t he t em s of service of t eachersshall be such as m ay be 21e para 13 of t he said it has also been st m edt hat t he byt he GuestTeachers issued a let t er llat ed372009grant ingt hem from passingt he 4 1 1 4 1 1 Te The saidlet t ewas challengedbefore t his Courf in CWP No 1 1 4562 of 2009 and ot her connect edpet it ionsA Division Bench of t his Court 1 allowed t he writ pet it ionsand set asidet he order grant ing t o t he P Guest Teach6rs The Guest i 1 Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t he Eligibilit y Test vide order d1lt ed6A20 10 t hen filed CivilAppealNo 9247 of2010 6GurpalSinghVe 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 n r rn3a Pe rl 1 1Ve e 17 1 lsI 0 St at e6f t 0f 2008 8i connect edpet it ions 1 16 1 e t 4 Honble t he Suprem eCourt consideringt he fact t hat in of adt isem ent dat ed1862009 t he select ionprocesshas already 4 conim encedand t he Guest Teacherswho were not part iesbeforet he Division 1 Bench of t he HighCourt have also appliedfor select ion has grant edlibert yt o t hemt o in t he select ionprocessbut t heir final resultwould not be 4 t ill furt herordersoft he Court videorderdat ed1562010 W C 0 0 I C I r Z 2 0 I C45 QO 7 Z Q 22 Mr t recruit ed f Krishan Chat rat h leam ed Senior counsel for t he arguedt hat t he of passingt he 1 t est would not be r 2005whereast he on t he GuestTeachersbecauset hey has been addedby wayof am endingst at ut oryServiceRulesof 1998 School andI nspect orCadre RulesSchool 1 Lect urer Rulesandt he ServiceRulesof 1994 and t he2000 Rules 1 1 t o t heleam ed counselin t he advert isem entfor regularrecruit m ent 1 such a cannot be t o nonsuit t he Guest facult y 1 t o anot herfacet of his argum entMr Chat rat hhas subm it t edt hat t he 1 t recruit edas Guest t eacherswhen Const it ut ion ight ySixt hl Am endm entAct 2002 was not ifledandby way of am endm entArt icles 214 1 1 1 23 5 Mr f 1 1 t has m ade anot her subm issiont hat by virt ue of 1 t lios6 candidat eswho have t he t rainingcert iOcat esand degreesas per t he norm sand st andardsfixedbyt he NCTE which is a prim ary 1 1 1 1993Act have been renderedineligibleAccording t o t he learned counselNCTE has fram ed 2001 Regulat ionsin dischargeof it s funct ion under Sect ion 126d9and in exerclse it s power under Sect ion of t he 1993 Act The 2001 Regulat ionshave been m ade eHect ive from42001 t as am endedin 2005 I t has been m aint ainedt hatby Regulat ion4 1 1 1 1 Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 1 n0 1 1 1 1 o el1 v4 I M e n I e e70 0 4441145Y eil79 4t 11 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 1 1 1 C9Vo 17449of2008 8 connect edpet it ions 1 17 0 1 a direct ionhas beenissuedt o all t he St at est o am endt heiirecruit m entrulesand 4 4 beingt hem in conform it ywit h t he 2001 24 lawwit h regaldt o 1 1 1 t he com pet enceof t he Haryand t o fram e t o VEUlOUS 1 1 1 Mr post s r 1 Chat rat hha addit ional l way of am endm ent t hat t he Const it ut ionprovidsfor dist ribut ionof 9 m ake laws on subj ect sI n t hat regardhe has refenedt o 1 1 VI I t h Schedule List 4 i 1 Union List List I I ie St at eList and List m I I Iie 1 r 0 0 I CD I Z r I 08 03 a Z Concurrent 1 Lit and has placedrelianceon Art icle 254 of t he Const it ut iont o t hatt he am endm entm adebyt he HaryanaLegislat ure1S in consist entwit h t he law m adeby t he Parliam ent inconfonnit yof 1993 Act and t he 2001 fram ed t hereunderand t hereforet he argum entis t hat t he Hm yana i lawlm ust r t t o t he Cent ral which laid down t he m inim um of educat ional of a t eacher According 1 t o t he leam ed t o 1 t he 1993Act was enact edby t he Parliam entwit h a vlew andcoordinat ed of t eacherseducat ionand for of it s st andardsuniform ly t he count ry He has m ade elaborat ereference t o Sect ion 1 t hat t he funct ionof t he r1e NCTE is t o lay down in respectof m inim um t o be as t eacher in schools or inst it ut ions 1 t he 4 power of t he NCTE t o m ake rulat ions under Sect ion leanledcounsel st at ed t hat such 1 m ade providefor for a person t o be em ployedas t eacherunder clause 6d9of arrearst o have been arguedist hat once t he Parliam ent has m aking Sect ion 12 Wt 1 i fram edt he 1993 Act and t he 2001 wit h regardt o m lnim um t o be em ployedas t eacherin school or in a Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh r 4 1 1 8 SleO4111MWrd514n JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4 1 1 7 1 m I Z 0 0 Z Z 1 1 1 1 L L C I c6 CI O 1 m Z I Clz 477 1 No 17449of2008 8 connect edpet it ions 18 J inst it ion t hent heSt at e hasno power Thereforet he HaryanaAct cannot byam endm entm adein t he year 2005 could t he eligibilit y t est by VMI OUS rules for various t ypes of t eachers t o t he learnedcounsel t he field is occupiedalreadyand in t hat regard he hasplacedrelianceon paras 16t o 18 23 and27 oft he ofHonble t he Court renderedin t he case ofGuiarat Universit y ve Shri Krishna ArR 1963SC 703laras 23 24 and 25 of Osm ania Universit yTeachers Associat ionve St at eof Andhra Pradesh 1987 SC 2034oaras 23 and 30 of t he j udgm entrenderedin t he case of Java GokuI Educat ion Trust Ve Dioceseof KaniirapaI lv AI R 2000 SC 1614eand para 16 oft he t hecase ofRN Gupt a ve St at e ofHarvana 2001 19SCT 417 25 his argum entfuer leam edcounselhas subm it t edt hat Honble t he Court haslaid down t hat t he St at eLegislat ure cannot higher t han t he one byt he Parliam ent byenact ingan Act superiorbody Therefore t he law m adeby t he Parliam ent whieh is a as per our Const it ut ionalSchem e m ust be upheldand t he law fram edbyt he St at eLegislat ureon t he sam e subj ectm ust be declaredvoid t o t he ext ent of repugnancy Therefore t he st and of t he St at e t hat ofm inim um byt he NCTE does not creat e any bar for t he St at et o any higher is alreadyset t ledand answeredby Honble t he Suprem eCourt I n t hat regardhe has placedreliance on various nam elySt at e of Tam il Nadu v Adhiyam an Educat ion Research I nst it ut e 1995 63 SLR 752 6paras35 361 Tika Ram ii v St at e ofUPe 1956 SCR 393 paras 35 and 36fhirum urga Kirupananda Vart var Thavat hiru 1 Sundara Swam inggalMedical Educat ion and Charit able Trust ve St at e of Tam il Nadu1996 3 SCC 15 03aras20 23 t o 27 8 349 and SP St ewart ve Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 1 I l Vo 17449of2008 8 connect edpet it ions 19 0 w i 1 1 1 BeK Roy AI R 1939Cal 628 Placingrelianceon t he ofHonblet he Court renderedin t he case ofDeep Chand ve St at eof P AI R 1959 SC 648 leam edcounselhas point edout t hat t here are t hree t have t o be keptin view for j udgingrepugnancybet weent wo 1 are as followsl 1 st s 19 1 Whet herParliam entint endedt o laydown an exhaust ivecode 1 in respectoft he Y 1 t he Act oft he St at e 2 1 t 1 1 i 1 1 i 639 Whet hert he law m ade byParliam entand t he law m adeby t heSt at e 1 9 occupy t he sam e fI eld 26 Learned 1 m ade a referencet o sim ilar observat ionsm ade in t he case of St at of Maharasht ra v Sant DnvaneshwarShikshan Shast ra 1 Mahavidvalava 9 SCC l Mr Chat rat h leam ed counselhas t hen t hatt he r V supralon 1 hasbeen t byt he UpendraRaPs case St at e is m erelya subesilent ioand per incurium ln Vlew oft helaw laid down in t he cases of5 1 of UePe 6 SCC 5861Divisional Cont roller KSRTC V Madadeva Shet t v 7 SCC 197 and St at e of Harvana ve Ranbir C 1R11200695 SCC 167 27 argiledt hat 2009 1 t he fact s of t he presentcase leam ed counsel has t est was conduct edin t hrear 2008 and t wice in t heyear The St at eofHaryanacould not find adequat enum ber of candidat esand 1 1 t ook a decisioil t o 1 result aRer gilinggrace m arksin case t heresult was 1 below 50 As a consequence t o declare a candidat e successSll in t he eligibilit y t est he was 1 grace m arks even upt o 695I o m arks 1 1 r 0 0 I CD I Z Q c6 00 7 Z 1 1 1 1 Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 61N e 24 5o1470991 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document e C1170 17449of2008 1 1 connect edpet it ions 20 4 1 4 1 t o t he leam edcounselsuch lS 811unahorisedact of fraudwhereas t hecandidat eslike t he A e who have been worldngas Guest t eacherfor 1 1 1 m r 0 0 I C5 I Z 14 n2 r c a5 ClO em o Z Qm 1 t 1 m oret han four 4 1 9 4 4 ars have been rendered Mr Chat rat h 1 hasgivendat at o elaborat ehis subm ission t 28 The ot herleam edcounselfor t he 1 t heargum ent s advancedbyMr Chat rat h 1 1 29 1 Mr Ram eshwarMalik learned Addit ional Advocat e General hashowever arguedt hatt hecont ent ionsraisedbyt he leam edcounsel for t he leam edcounselhas placed are no longerres reliance I n supportof his subm ission on t he of Honble t he 1 Court t r t 1 reilderedin t he case ofUpendraRai 1 I pral Lm ed 1 counsel hasplacedrelianceon paras 17 18 and 19 and arguedt hat a speciflcargum ent sim ilar t 6 t he one raisedbyt he learnedcounsel for t he t hatt he 1993 Act t he Act of t he St at eon account of Anicle 254 of t he Const it ut ion read wit hEnt ry25 of List I I I of VI I t h Schedulewas rej ect edPlacingreliance on para 19 of t he j udgm entleam edcounselhassubm it t edt hat t he 1993Act was enact edt o t he t eachersin any syst emand t he TeachersTraining in t he 1 1 count ryand it onlydealswit h t eacherst raininginst im t esand has gotnot hingt o wit h schoolslike Prim arySchools HighSchools 1 t Schooland t he Universit ies Mr Malik st at est hat appoint m entas t eacheras per t he view of Honble t he Suprem eCourt in t he 1 1 educat ilal inst it ut ions like Prim arySchools cannot be prescribed undert he 1993Act Hehas also referredt o ot her paraswhere Sect ion 20 1 Sect ion32 have been dealt wit h and all argum ent sof t he nat ure by t he learnedcounsel for t he pet it ionershave been rej ect ed 30 Mr Malik has subm it t edt hat in any case t he Parliam ent in order t o r Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 1 b 1 1 1 1 t 1 4 3 n 1 1 V I rneW lv7n2r t l 1 4 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 CW No 17449of2008 connect edpet it ions 1 C 1 21 7 07 I r achievet he m inim um st andardshave laid down m inim um but t here 1Sno bar t hat t he St at eLegislat urecannot laydown any superior He has placedrellance on a DivisionBenchj udgm entof t his Court renderedin 1 t hecase of Aiav Malik ve Paniab Universit v 1992 21SLR 507 a Single Bench renderedin t he case of Anand Kum ar ve St at eof Harvana t 1 1 Cl 0 0 I CD Z 0 I 08 OO m Z t l 8 200921SLR524 and 1 St at eofTam iI Nadu ve SeVeBrat heep 200414 SCC 513 1 31 Haviilgheardlearned at a considerable 1 1 1 ofHonble t he Suprem eCourt in t hecase of t he 1 paperbook and rcord of t he case wit h t heirable assist ancewe would first like t t o ext ract t he ident icalam endm entm adeby t he St at eof Haryanaon 2432008 1 1 r 1 Pe1 t o P4 in various st ry Rules For exam ple in School and I nspect ionCadre Rules for t o t he post sundert hose rules cert ificat eI of havingqualifiedt he eligibilit yt est has been m ade 1 1 t in AppendixB of t he School and Cadre 1 1 1 Rulest he followingam endm enthas been V 1 t I l 1 r 32 1 1 i againstserial er 2 under col 3 for ent ry 9 t he 11 ent rlesshall be subst it ut ednam ely 1 1 1 1 t V iv9 Mat ric wit h HindilSanskrit 6v9 Cert ificat e of having quali6edSchool Teachers Eligibilit yTest STETY 1 l 1 6ii9i againstserial num ber 4 under colum n 3 for ent ry v t he followingent riesshall be subst it ut ednam ely 1 Ov9 Mat ris wit h HindilSanskrit 1 6v9 Cert iflcat e of having qualified School Teachers Eligibilit yTest OSTET97 1 By Vlrt ue of aforesaid am endm entincorporat edon 240008 t he 1 1 l 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 b r t 1 j l I e e n l 17 7 eA012 n ovZI nrl r CWf Vo 17449of2008 85connect edpet it ions 22 0 i t eachersat various level coveredby t he Rules in Annexures I 1 t o P4 are requiredt o 1 Circum st ances t he t t est of t he St at eof Haryana I n sim ilar has been debat edbeforeHonble t he Suprem eCourt lI l Upendra case supra I n t hat case t he of Diplom a111 Educat ionODEd9used t o be 4 t o Basic Teachers Cert ificat eBTC Accordingt o t he st at ut oryrules known as UP Basic Educat ion i 1 ServiceRules 1981 t he t raining was BTC et c or any ot hert rainingcourse t heret 6 However t he writ 1 by t he Govem m entas t hereinonlyhad DEd which longercoilsidered 1 l dat ed t o BTC by virt ue of Govem m ent circular he did not fulSl t he as per t he advert isenlentissiled 1 on28A1999 which was m ade subj ectm at t er before hisview 1 r 11 t Court A leam edSingleJudgedism issedt he pet it ionbut was reversedby a Division Bench holdingt hat DEd 1 1 has t o On an appealt o Honble t he Suprem eCoun it was held t hat t he grant of andlor revocat ion of 1S I l 1 r ccision which 1S lll 1 t he sole discret ion of t he concerned I n t hecourse of argum ent st he writ t herein had subm it t ed t hathe 1 t he laid down in t he 1993Act and t herefore 1 1 t he 1993 Act would override t he UP Rules of 1981 in view of t he fact t hat iscoveredbyEnt ry25 ofList I U ofVUt h Schedulev onaccount Ar8cle 254 oft he Const it ut ion wouldprevailTherefore t he 1993Act readwit h 2001 Regulat ionsm ust prevail 1 1 The aflresaid argum entwas by t heir Lordships lI l para19 of t he j udgm entwhich ieads t husl b 19 1 A of t he NCTE Act showst hat t his Act was m adet o 1 Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 0 I l I i 11 44 4 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 I l 1 0 0 0 C5 Z I O8 00 7 Z Qm 1 1 1 1 1 0 41 482 1No 17449of2008 8 connect edpet it ions 23 f2I t he t eacherst rainingsyst emand t he t eachers t raining vinst it ut es in t he count ryI t m ay be m ent ionedt hat t here are t wo t ypesof educat ionalinst it ut ions 6l9 ordinaryeducat ional inst it ut ions like prim aryschools high schools int erm ediat e and universit lesand 62 t eacherst raininginst it ut esThe NCTE Act onlydeals wit h t he secondcat egoryof inst it ut ionsVl t eacherst raininginst it ut esI t hasnot hingt o do wit h t he ordinary inst it ut ionsreferredt o above Hence t he as t eacher in t he ordinaryeducat ionalinst it ut ions liket he prim aryschool cannot be prescribedunder t he NCTE Act andt he essent ial byt he local Act s and Rules in each St at e I n UP t he essent ial as a prim aryschool t eacherin a Junior Basic Schoolis 1 by Rule 8 of t he UP Basic Educat ion Service Rules 1981 which have been fram ed under t he UP Basic Educat ionAct 1972 A personwho doesnot have t he m ent ionedin Rule 8 of t he aforesaidRules cannot validlybe appoint edas an Assist antMast er or Assist ant Mist ress in a Junior Basic School93 33 Som eot her argum ent sraised on t he basis of Sect ion126d9also fail t o find favour wit h t heir LordshipsofHonble t he Suprem eCourt and t he sam e wererej ect edin para 22 and 23 which readst husl 1 1 1 7 22 I t m ay be rnent ionedt hat t he word inst it ut ion is defined in Sect ion 2e9of t he NCTE Act t o m ean an inst it ut ion which offers courses or t rainingin t eachereducat ion Thus t he NCTE Act does not deal wit h t he ordinaryeducat ional inst it ut ions like prim ary Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 4n I l 1 1 1 P JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4 1 1 r t 1 1 r t l t l WI 0 1W e 011 C W7 t41 177 1 0 eer 1 1 r 9 1 C 0 rs l 1 r r 1 1 1 CNo of2008 85connect edpet it ions 24 c v1 1 6 1 schols highschools int erm ediat ecollegeor univet sit yThe word b 4 inst it ut ion as defined in Sect ion2629onlym eans t eacherst raining inst it ut eandnot 1 t he ordinaryeducat ionalinst it ut ionsHence lt 1S onlyt he t eacherst raininginst it ut ionswhich have t o seekgrof 1 recnit ion or cont inuat ionof from t he Regional Conlm it t ee The ordinaryeducat ionalinst it ut ionsdo not have t o P t f suchrecognit ionor cont inuat ion under t he NCTE Act I n t he NCTE Act does not relat et o t he ordinaryeducat ional inst it ut ionat all We t hereforefail t o underst andhow it can be said t hatt heNCTE Act overridest he UP Basic Educat ionAct andRules m ade t hereunder I n fact t he 6 t wo Act s operat ein t wo diffeientflelds The NCTE Act deals wit h t he t eachers t raining t inst it ut ionswhile t he UP Basic Educat ion Act deals wit h t he r schools in UP and not any t eacherst raining inst it ut e The argum entof leam ed Counsel for t he 1S t huwhollym isconceived 1 i 1 23 1The wit h t hesam e fallacYe The Division Bench ln our opinion wronglyrelied upon Art icle 1 254 t he Const it ut ion Art icle 254 as st at ed above has no 1 1 1 in t his case at all becauset he t wo Act s operat ein t WO fields I n our opiniont he Division Bench t herefore t hatt he he appellantbefore t he Division 9 1 t he requisit equalificat ionfor beingappoint edas an Assist antMast er in aj uniorbasic school 91 1 P 34 On account oft he view t aken by Honble t he Suprem eCourt in t he aforesaidj udgm entansweringsom e of t he basic issues raised byMr Chat rMh Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh e r 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document i 1 0 0 I t 5 I Z Q I Z CQ A7 Z 4 4 C 1 1 1 C i 0 0 I C5 I Z Q I t Z 0 7 Z Om 1 1 No 17449of2008 85connect edpet it ions 25 rJl The dealwit h variousargum ent shasbeenobviat ed Had it not been so we m ighthave undert aken a det ailed exercise wit h regardt o vanous 1 subm issionsm adebyMr Chat m t h 1 35 To be fair t o t he leam ed counsel we t ake not ice of t he argum ent 1 raisedby Mr Chat rat hwhen he urgedt hat t he St at ecannot higher t n t he one prescribedby t he Act or by 1 I n t hatregardhe had placedreliance on various like Adhiyam ailEducat ion Research I nst it ut e i lpral and Thirum urga Vart yarThavat hiru Sundara MedicaI Educat ion t 1 f supraland ot her sim ilar However unablet o acceptt he subm ission because all t hose cases have em ergedout of 1 order passedwhile rej ect ing did not llfil t he m inim um st andardslaid down e byvarious like Medical CouncillDent alCouncil I t was in t hat cont ext t hat t heir Lordshipsof Honble t he Suprem eCourt had observedt hat higher norm s t han t he lninim um cannot be laid down Those cases are ent irely and would not be at t ract edt o t he conoversy 1 raised in t he presentcase Moreover t he cont roversyit self has been answered by t heir 1 lI l UpendraRais case supral by referringt o t he sam e very 1 t he 1993 Act and t he 2001 1 wit h t he argum entt hat Guest t eacherswho have been rorkingSlnce We are also not 2002 are 1 t o be t reat eddifferent lyt han t hose who have appliedfor t he first t im e Whet iGuest t eacherswere recruit edt heywere 81l1ym ade aware t hat 1 t heir for a specifiedperiodand it was no subst it ut e for regularrecruit m ent I f t he rules have been changedby t he t im e regular recruit m ent are m ade t hen t he Guest t eachers cannot com plainurgingt hat Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 1 r JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 1 485 e WP No 17449of2008 colm ect edpet it ions am endm ent1Sret rospect iveTherelS 26 Jl 21 involved We are also recruit ed on account of highst andardsof t he t est I t is for t he St at e t o fram eit s policya fort ioriwhich flows from t he m adein UpendraRais case supral The Court cannot rem writ et hepolicyof t he St at eunless lt is fOUndt o be againstt he m andat eof t he Const it ut ion Therefor 36 As a sequelt o t he abovediscussiont hese Chat rat h pet it ionsfail and t he st at ut oryrules vide not iScat ionsdat ed243008 P1 am endm entm ade in t he t o P4 are upheld A oft his orderbeplacedon t hefiles of connect edcases MeMe KUMARI JUDGE AeNe JAL JUDGE 1 Novem ber29 2010 Pkapoor t S No 1 2 3 4 Case NO Part iesNam e 17449of 2008 19556of 2008 1737of 2009 YANA AND ORS VI ER HARYANA AND OTRS KUMAR OTHERS Ve STATE OF MANJU v STATE OF Y OTS 2009 RAJESH KUMAR v STATE OF OTHERS Y AND Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 0 Cs 45 Z 4 COzl OO Z 11 6786NO t I W5 J 27 1 1 4 t j C 0 0 I I Z I 08 03 3 Z 1 1 j 1 1 1 1 t 1 5 6 7 8 9 2009 1 SHASFHKALA v STATE OF HARYANA AND OTRS 12865of 1 2009 USHA YADAV v STATE OF HARYANA AND OTI RS t 1 2009 SATENDERSI NGH v STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 13998of 2009 OM PARKASH v STATE OF HARYANA AND OTFRS i 18966of 2009 BI RENDER SlNGH v STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 1 10 8001 of 2010 SANDEEP KUMAR AND OTI RS FI ARYANA AND OTHERS v STATE OF P i 1 4 1 9 MM KlUlM JUDGE AeNeJI NDALI JUDGE I t l Novem ber292010 Pkapoor 1 1 1 1 1 f t 1 1 1 Suresh Kum ar 2014.03.31 10: 59 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh i 4 I l JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document