I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB 8 HARYANA AT v. St at e

Since t heissues are generalin nat ure fact sofeach case are not beingdiscussed However resum e of t he fact sis beingnot icedfrom CWP No 407 of2010 Market Com m it t ees Bhiwani and Pipli issued advert isem ent sinvit ing plot sin open auct ion in New Grain Met s est ablishedin t hese dist rict s All t he were allot t edplot sin t he open auct ion 25010of t he bid m oneywas t o be at t he init ial st agewhereasrest of t he75010sale pricewas t o be deposit edwit hin 30 daysof t he receiptof allot m ent let t er wit hout int erestor in half yearlyinst allm ent swit h int erest c of 75010per annumaccruingfrom t he dat e of issuance of allot m ent I et t er One of t he Rawat Seem a 2014.04.15 15: 56 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh condit ionsin t he allot m ent I et t er t heallot t eet 0 com plet et he Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document t 453 CWP No 407 of2010 3 const ruct ionwit hin one year t hedat eofallot m ent I t is com m on case of all t he t hat neit hert he sit e was readyfor const ruct ionnor was offeredt o t he despit e request s no6 vide I et t erdat edll3986 askedt he t o deposit t het ot alam ount wit hin 15daysI t is st at edt hatt he t he am ount of inst allm ent salongwit h int erest and penalint erest I t is case of t ho t hat despit edepositof t he ainount in som e cases t he not deliveredby t he Market Com m it t ee and from t im e t o t im e for deliveryof physical of t he allot t edplot sSom eof t he howeveI st art edraisingconst ruct ion t he const ruct ion of shopse Pet it lionerwas issued a show cause not ice dat ed 2532006 whyt he plotbe not resum ed for raisingconst ruct ion wit hout and dem arcat ion Pet it ioner t hathe has raisedt he const ruct ionin t he year 2007 He was issuedanot herlet t erdat ed2272008 t o appearbefore t he aut horit iesfor violat ion oft he condit ionsno12 and 17 of t he allot m ent let t er I n t hem eant im e t he issuedan advert isem entdat ed 2472008 grant ingext ension of 1 years for raisingconst ruct iont o t he allot t eeswho were allot t edplot spriort o 1032000 I n response t o t he advert isem entt he pet it ionercom m unicat edt o t he t hat in view oft he lat est policydecision dat ed2402008 t he is ent it ledt o raise const ruct ion I t is allegedt hat on t his replybeing81edt henot iceissuedt o t he was not pressedand t o t he cont raryanot herlet t er dat ed 1822009 was issued Rs2751001 as noneconst ruct ionfee for 1 L 0 U I C9 4 Z 54 r 4 I m 1 Z Qo 7 Z t he periodwe 1 6987 t o 3122008 in t ohelightof t he decision of t he Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Rawat Seem a 2014.04.15 15: 56 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh board dat ed 142009 Pet it ioner 454 4 CWP No 407 of2010 m 4e t he dem andbut t he sam e was ilot considered The filed CWP No 8151of2009 t it ledas ParveenKum ar Vs St at e andot hers This ofwit h a direct iont o t he t o decide t he wit hin a periodof t hreem ont hsfrlomt he dat eof receiptof cert ifledcopy of t he order The of t he has been vide order dat ed 169009 and t he t his Court and soughtfollowingreliefsl 4 i lssue a Writin t henat ure of Cert iorarit hereby t henot icedat ed1822009 asnoneconst ruct ion am ountofRs2751001 is beingdem andedfrom t he t o t he orderdat ed 31122008anddlsofor 16112009 Annexure P31 vide whicht heappealcun fee for t heperiodfrom 16987 Pe101vide which an dat ed2432009 lnnexure P ll was dism issed t he a writ in t henat ure Of Mandam ust herebydirect ing t ohcplotof t he not t o resum e also for direct ingt he const ruct ionfee int erestor penalt yet c from t he t o issuet he byt hepet it ioneron his plotallot t ed by Mwket Com m it t ee cert iOcat eoft he buildingconst ruct ed not t o chargeany nonm since he had t heent ire am ount as pert he t erm s8ccondit ionsm ent ionedin t heallot m entlet t er P in t he replyj ust ifledt heir act ion and dem andof nonconst ruct ion fee on t he groundt hat t he pet it ionersfailed t o raise const ruct ionfor num berof years I t is 8lrt herpleadedt hat t here Was 110 of deliveryof physical of t he plotas t he allot m ent it self was t he m ode of deliveryof I t is also pleadedt hat t he raised t he const ruct ionwit hout dem arcat ionandsanct ion from t he aut horit yand t hus t he const ruct ion raised by t he pet it ioner1S Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Rawat Seem a 2014.04.15 15: 56 illegal Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh m Q 0 Ca I C5 I 41 Z 2 C 0 Z m 7 Z OL 4eeee 455 4 1 CWP No 407 of2010 5sn Sim ilar issue has beenconsidered byt his Court in a bunch of writ pet it ionsbeingCWP Noe 1122 of 2003 t it led as Raksha Rani Vse HSAMB and ot hers and ot her connect edm at t ers decidedon 6122010 On considerat ionof t he vanous reliedupon byt he aut horit ies includingt he of Honble Suprem eCourt in case of U ChandigarhAdm inist rat ion and anot her Vse Am arj eetSinghand ot hers report edas JeT 2009 11SC 39 and MunicipalCorporat ion ChandigarhVs I nvest m cnt s Pvt Lt de as 2006 SCC 109 and followingobservat ionshavebeenm ade 4r 1 All cases dat ed1032000 shall be t ofram ing byt he cont ract Under t he cont ract t here is no condi1ionor covenont t hatt heliabilit yt o payint erestpenalint erest shall be uponproviding facilit iesam enit ies Such oft heallot t eeswhowere allot t ed plot sprior t o 1032000 are liable t o pay int erestand penalt y in accordancewit h t he t enns andcondit ionsoft heallot m ent let t er 2 Suchoft he allot t eeswho were allot t edplot saft er2000 are liable t o pay int erestand penal t hedat eoer of possessionwas m ade Thepossessionis t o be dat eofbasicfacililieslike roads wat er sllpply are m adeavailable Thus t heliabilit yt o pay int erest lder t he 0 0 0 CS9 I Z C I Z ClO em o Z r slat ut oryprovisionsbecom espayablefromt he da1ebasic facilit iesareprovided 39I n sofaras t he liabilit yt o pay at t he t im e ofallot m entofplot sin t heyear1988 t here was no is concerned is 0rcd provisioneit her in t hecont ract or any st at ut oryprovisionfor Paym entof ext ension fee t heJlrslt im e cam e t o be int roducedvidepolicydet isiondat ed29A1998 and t hus t he ext ensionfeebecom espayableonlyin respectofplot s whereconst ruclion hasnot beencarried out in accordance Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document wit h t he t erm s and condit ions dat ed Rawat Seem a 2014.04.15 15: 56 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 4 CWPNoO7of2010 4 29A1998 13 I ssues beingsim ilar t hesepet it ionsare being of 111 t erm soft he Copyoft his orderbe placedon eachconnect edfile PERMOD KOHLO JUDGE e I ucky r 1 1Z 0 Ca3 Z Co Z QO m 2 Z Qe Rawat Seem a 2014.04.15 15: 56 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document