✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 04 Dec 2024

12.2024 Date o Pawan Kuma Kumar v. State of Hary f Haryana & Ors.

CRM-M No. 24892 of 2024NIDHI GUP I GUPTA2 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
04 Dec 2024
Bench
NIDHI GUP I GUPTA

Judgment

M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH NIDHI GUPTA Present: - cate for Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate fo Mr. Gagandeep Goel, Advocate vocate for the petitioner cing). (through Video Conferencing). Mr. Surinder Kumar Dagar, DA ar, DAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUP I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed und ed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of ce of a direction that FIR No. 290 290 dated 27.12.2023 registered under Sectio Sections 304-B, 316, 323, 34 IPC , IPC at Police Station Panjokhra, District Am t Ambala, be directed to be investi investigated by some investigating agency or so y or some other senior police officer no icer not below the rank of SSP. At the very outset, learned coun d counsel for the State refers to the averments m ents made in para 11 of the status rep d by tus report dated 05.11.2024 filed by way of affid f affidavit of Sh. Rajat Gulia, Depu lice, , Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ambala Can la Cantt., wherein it has been mentione entioned that ‘there is no negligence on the part art of accused persons and that the t the daughter of the complainant was provide vided proper medical treatment’. Fu SI Further, on instructions from SI Gian Chan Chand, learned counsel submits that after completion of investigation igation, the police has prepared a can cancellation report in the matter RISHU KATARIA 2024.12.09 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-248 24892-2024 -2- on 06.07.202 .07.2024 and the same is likely to be to be presented before the learned trial Court w ourt within a period of 04 weeks from s from today. In view of the above, learne learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ts that he may be permitted to withd withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to th to the petitioner to take recourse t , in urse to the alternative remedy, in accordance w ance with law. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdraw, with the ith the liberty aforesaid. 2024

04.12.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2024.12.09 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 04 Dec 2024. The bench was NIDHI GUP I GUPTA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM-M No. 24892 of 2024). ← Search more judgments