✦ High Court of India · 30 Jun 2010

Walit yRam and ot hers v. St at eofPunj aband ot hers

Case Details High Court of India · 30 Jun 2010
Court
High Court of India
Decided
30 Jun 2010
Bench
Not available
Length
2,697 words

passedin t he first counselingand who had not passedPunj abit ill 222009 and also t he candidat eswho had not deposit edt he fee and 2t Ht willingt o depositt he fee were Alrt her called for counselingOI l 1982009 The 4 pet it ionershave t he publicnot ice dat ed 2372009 r 172009 wherebyt he condit ion of 500I o and45I om arks for General and Reserved Cat egoriesrespect ively was int roducedas eligibilit yfor adm ission t o ETT course The cont ent ion of t he pet it ionerslS t hat by 1SSUlng publicnot ices t he originaladvert isem entnot ice 1S soughtt o be am endedwhich is ln law The St at ehas flled a det ailed reply I t is st at ed t hat t he originalpublicnot ices dat ed 1672008 and 23 2009 were ln act t he advert isem entnot ices These not ices were issued onlyfor collect ion of inform at iont o ident ifyeligiblecandidat es from EGS volunt eers I t is furt her st at ed t hat t he publicnot ices dat ed 2372009 and 172009 t houghissued by way of but lI l fact t he publicnot ices laid down t he for adm issionfor Teacher Training Furt her st and of t he St at e 1S t hat t he eligibilit ycondit ionshave been laid down by t he NCTE t he apex body which regulat est he of ETT and ot her Teacher TrainingCourses ln t he count ry The St at e has also placedon record Annexure Rel which 1S Appendix 2 of t he norm s st andards for Teacher issued by t he NCTE Under 32 t he said Sahil Soni not it lcat iont he qualiScat ionsfor adm issiont o BEd Course are prescribed 2016.03.21 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document The condit ion reads as under1 Gupt a Suruchi 2014.04.09 15: 01 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 56 4 m r1 0 O C Z 5 r Arm 1 Nos13531 12289 and 14702 of2009 17355 12463 12525 1371713801 14704 7 32 Eligibilit y 322 Candidat e wit h at least 50I o m arks in t he seniorit ysecondary 32 The reservat ion for SCI STI OBC and ot her cat egoriesshall be as per t he rules of t he Cent ral Governm ent lSt at eGovernm ent whichever 1S applicableThere shall be relaxat ionof 5I o m arks favour of SCI STI OBC and ot her cat egoriesof candidat es Thought he St at e relied upon t he norm s prescribedby t he NCTE however t he NCTE was not a part y t o t he pet it ionVide int erocut ory order dat ed 20102009 passed som e t he writ pet it ionsincluding CHPNo2463 of 2009 NCTE was im pleadedas part y 00 asked t o llle it s replyNCTE has also flled it s replysupport ingt he st and of Z Qm t he St at eas regardt he eligibilit yprescribedfor adm ission t o t he course I t is St at edt hat under 2005 Regulat ionand norm s and st andard for Teacher t he eligibilit yprescribedwas at least 45I om arksint he it s equivalentexam inat ioI However t hese regulat ions subst it ut edby 2007 wherein t he m inim um m arks prescribedwere I east 50I o 111 t he Sr SecondaryExam inat ionwit h relaxat ion of 5I o m arks in case of Reserved Cat egoriesI n view of t he above st and of t he NCTE t he eligibilit yprescribedby t he St at e vide it s not ificat ionsdat ed2372009 and 1782009 cannot be said t o be illegalI t 1S alSOrelevant t o not ice t hat t he first t WO publicnot ices dat ed 1672008 and 231 2009 m ent ion about t he inform at iont o ident i67t he Gupt a Suruchi 2014.04.09 15: 01 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh eligiblecandidat es Paragraph2 of t he aforesaid public not ice reads as Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 57 4r 1 C 0 C0 I C W Z t r I ClO W2 Z Ll a r Nos 12289 and 14702 of2009 1735512463 12525 13717 13801 1470 8 The eligibilit yand ident it yfor eligiblecandidat esfor adm ission t o ETT Cours I t is evident t hat public not ice dat ed 2372009 prescribest he m lnlm um percent agefor Generaland ReservedCat egoriesLearned counsel t he pet it ionershas relied upon t wo j udgm ent sof t his Court I n t he case of Subhash Chandra VS The I nst it ut e of Medical Educat ion and Research Chandigarhand anot her 199731RSJ 346 it has been held t hat t he adm issionbrochurecannot be perm it t edt o be am ended h St ae A Slm ilar view has been held lll t he case of Munish Khanduj avse Guru Jam bheshwarUniversit yHisar ot hers 200231RSJ 463eI n t he present case t he quest ion is of t he eligibilit yThe flrst t wo publicnot ices relied upon by t he pet it ionersare 111 fact not t he com plet ebrochurefor adm issionThe C condit ionin t he aforesaidnot ices is regardingt he infonnat ionin respectoft he eligibilit y oft he EGS Volunt eersThese not iceswere layingdown t he eligibilit yas per t he norm s followedby t wo pubI icnot ices laid down by t he NCTE I t is also pert inentt o not e t hat as t he reply flled by t he NCTE t hese eligibilit ycondit ionshave been laid down by t he st at ut oryreguI at ions fram ed by t he NCTE The st at ut orycondit ion laid down cannot be dispensedwit h These condit ions have t o be followed beingessent ial eligibilit yfor adm issiont o t he course These pet it ionswere flled for adm issiont o t he Course duringt he sesslon 20092010 I t is m ore t han one year Ot herwise also at t his belat ed st age no relief can be grant edt o t he pet it ionersI n CWP Nosl2525 and Gupt a Suruchi 2014.04.09 15: 01 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 13713 of 2009 t he pet it ionershavealso placedon record a publicnot ice Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document r No13531 12289 and 14702 of2009 17355 12463 12525 13717 13801 14704 1 4 9 dat ed 2622010 wherein t he EGS volunt eers have been given special chance t o im prove t he percent ageI t is cont ended on behalf of t he pet it ionerst hat t he pet it iOnersare ent it led t o im provet heir percent ageand t heym av be perm it t edt o do so Suft I ce it t o say t hat if t he pet it ionersare ent it led t o im provet heir percent agein t erm s of t he aforem ent ionedpublic not ice t heyare at libert yt o do SO On of t heir percent age t heywill ot herwisebecolneeligiblet o applyand seek adm ission t o t he Course However Academ ic Session t his is possibleonly for fut ure adm issions The Current com m enced m ore t han one year back and t hust he peUt lonersare not ent it led t o seek any benefit of t his publicnot ice at t his st age I n view of t he above I no m erit 111 t hese writ pet it ions Dism issedNo order as t o cost s Copyoft his order be placedon record on each concem ed Sle O 6PERMOD KOHLI I JUDGE C 64 1 m C 0 43 I Cao Z a 0 00 QO Z Ll 30 s2010 MFK Not elWhet hert o be referredt o report eror not lYESI NO t D Y0 Gupt a Suruchi 2014.04.09 15: 01 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments