Surjit Kumar & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
of appeal, this petition is disposed of, relegating the petitioner to
Provisions considered
Judgment
Present:- Mr. Deepak Arora-I, Advocate for the petitioners. ORDER: ----- This petition has been filed for a direction to release the truck of the petitioner which had been intercepted at the ICC Barrier on
Operative part
13.10.2008 under Section 51 of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (for short, “the Act”). Learned counsel for the petitioner says that after filing of the writ petition, an order has been passed by the revenue authorities under Section 51(7) of the Act imposing penalty and a demand of Rs.92,820/- has been raised. It is also not disputed that the said order is appealable under Section 62(5) of the Act. In view of above, since the petitioner has alternative remedy of appeal, this petition is disposed of, relegating the petitioner to alternative remedy. ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE November 05, 2008 ashwani ( L. N. MITTAL ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: of appeal, this petition is disposed of, relegating the petitioner to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 — s. 51.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 05 Nov 2008. The bench was ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, L N MITTAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.