✦ High Court of India · 30 Jun 2010

DATE OF DECI SI ON 30 e602010 Pet it ioners 1eCWP Noe13531of2009 v. St at eofPunj aband ot hers 2eCWP N0012463of2009 Balj it Kaur

Case Details High Court of India · 30 Jun 2010
Court
High Court of India
Decided
30 Jun 2010
Bench
Not available
Length
2,660 words

have challengedt he publicnot lce dat ed 237 2009 172009 t he condit ion of 500I oand450I om arks for General and Reserved r respect ivelywas int roducedas eligibilit yfor adm ission t o ETT course The cont ent ion of t he 1S t hat by 1SSUlng publicnot ices t he originaladvert isem entnot ice 1S soughtt o be am endedwhich is in law The St at ehas flled a det ailedreply I t is st at ed t hat t he originalpublicnot ices dat ed 1672008 and 231 2009 were in fact not t he advert isem entnot ices These not ices were issuedonlyfor collect ion of inform at iont o ident i67eligiblecandidat es from EGS volunt eers I t is furt her st at ed t hat t he publicnot icesdat ed 2372009 and 1782009 t houghissued by way of but ln fact t he publicnot ices laid down t he for adm ission for Teacher Training Furt her st and of t he St at e is t hat t he eligibilit ycondit ions have been laid down by t he NCTE t he apex body which regulat est he im part ingof ETT and ot her Teacher TrainingC0urses 111t he count ryThe St at e has also placedon record Annexure Ral which is Appendix2 of t he norm s st andards for Teacher issued by t he NCTE Under 32 of t he said not iflcat ion t he for adm ission t o BEd Course are Anit a 2014.04.11 13: 05 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh The condit ion reads as under1 Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 77 4 1 CL 0 C C5 r Z V t 05 0 4r SS Z Llw CWP No3531 12289and 14702of2009 17355 12463 12523717 13801 1470 7 32 Eligibilit y 322 Candidat e wit h at least 500I om arks in t he seniorit ysecondary 322 The reservat ion for SCI STI OBC and ot her shall be as per t he rules of t he Cent ral Govem m ent lSt at e Governm ent whichever 1S applicableThere shall be relaxat ion of 50I om arks 111favour of SCI STI OBC and ot her cat egoriesof candidat ese55 Thought he St at e relied upon t he norm s prescribedby t he NCTE however t he NCTE was not a part yt o t he pet it ionVide int erocut ory order dat ed 20102009 passedln som e of t he writ pet it ionsincluding CWPN02463 of 2009 NCTE was im pleadedas part y askedt o file it s replyNCTE has also filed it s replysupport ingt he st andof t he St at eas regardt he eligibilit yprescribedfor adm issiont o t he course I t is st at ed t hat under 2005 Regulat ionand norm s and st andardfor TeacherProgram m et he eligibilit y was at least 45I o m arksin t he it s equivalentexam inat ion However t hese subst it ut edby 2007 wherein t he m inim um m arks were at I east 50I o in t he Sr Exam inat ion wit h relaxat ion of 50I om arks in case of Reserved Cat egoriesI n view of t he above st and of t he NCTE t he eligibilit yprescribedby t he St at e vide it s not iflcat ions dat ed2372009 and 1782009 cannot be said t o be illegalI t 1S also relevant t o not ice t hat t he flrst t wo publicnot ices dat ed 1672008 and 232009 speciflcallym ent ion about t he inform at ion t o ident ifyt he Anit a 2014.04.11 13: 05 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh eligiblecandidat es Paragraph2 of t he aforesaid publicnot ice reads as Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 78 V 36 1 0 0 O C 2 m 06 CLl m w Z CL 4J 1 CWP Nosl3531173551246312525137171380114704 12289and 14702of2009 8 The eligibilit yand ident it yfor eligiblecandidat esfor adm ission t o ETT Cours I t is evident t hat publicnot ice dat ed 237 2009 prescribest he m lnlm um for General and ReservedCat egoriesLeam ed counsel t he pet it ionershas relied upon t wo of t his Court I n t he case of Subhash Chandra vse The I nst it ut e of Medical Educat ion and Research Chandigarhand anot her 199731RSJ 346 it been held t hat t he adm ission brochure cannot be perm it t edt o be am endedor alt ered at t he st ageA sim ilar view has been held in t hecase 0f Munish Khandt lj avse Guru Jam bheshwar UniversiorHisar and ot hers 20031 RSJ 463 I n t he presentcase t he quest ionis of t he eligibilit yThe flrst t wo publicnot ices reliedupon byt hepet it ionersare 111 fact not t he com plet ebrochure foradm ission The condit ionin t heaforesaidnot ices is regardingt he inform at ionin respectoft he eligibilit y oft he EGS Volunt eers These not ices were followed byt wo publicnot ices layingdown t he eligibilit yas per t he norm s laid down by t he NCTE I t 1S also pert inentt o not e t hat as per t he replyfiled by t he NCTE t hese eligibilit ycondit ions have been laid down by t he st at ut ory fram ed by t he NCTE The st at ut orycondit ion laid down cannot be wit h These condit ions have t o be followed beingessent ial eligibilit yfor adm ission t o t he course Theseepet it ionswere filed for adm ission t o t he Course duringt he session 20092010 I t is m ore t han one year Ot herwise also at t his belat ed st ageno relief can be grant edt o t he I n CWP Nos12525 and Anit a 2014.04.11 13: 05 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh 13713 of 2009 t he pet it ionershavealso placedon record a publicnot ice Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 R CWP Nose13531 17355 12463 12525 13717 13801 14704 12289and 14702 of2009 9 dat ed 262010 wherein t he EGS volunt eers have been given special chance t o im prove t he percent ageI t is cont ended on behalf of t he pet it ionerst hat t he pet it ionersare ent it led t o im provet heir percent ageand t heym ay be perm it t edt o do SO Suffice it t o say t hat if t he pet it ionersare ent it led t o im provet heir percent agein t erm s of t he aforem ent ionedpublic not ice t heyare at libert yt o do so On of t heir percent age t heywill ot herwise becom 6 eligiblet o applyand seek adm ission t o t he Course However t his is possibleonlyfor fut ure adm issions The Current Academ ic Session com m enced m ore t han one year back and t hus t he are not ent it ledt o seek any benefit of t his publicnot ice at t his st age I n view of t he above I find no m erit in t hese writ pet it ions Dism issed No order as t o cost s Copyoft his order be placedon record on each concem ed flle V 1 C 0 Ca 0 t Z Lr m rm5 08 L10 t 3 Z Om JV 1 PERMOD KOHLI 9 JUDGE 3 0 6 2010 MFlK Not eWhet her t o be referred t o report eror not YESI NO Anit a 2014.04.11 13: 05 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments