Mr. Madan Pal, Advocate for & Anr. v. State of Haryana aryana and o

Mr. Madan Pal, Advocate for the applicants-petitioners s. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G dl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GU HI GUPTA J. (Oral) CM-4077 4077-CII-2026 Prayer in this application is ion is for placing on record the rejoinder o nder on behalf of petitioners to the to the reply filed by respondent No.2. The application is allowed s ed subject to all just exceptions and the rejo he rejoinder is taken on record. COCP-203 2037-2025 Present contempt petition ition has been filed alleging violation o tion of order dated 27.5.2024 (Anne (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- ordinate B ate Bench of this Court in CWP-126 12634-2024 titled as “Rajesh Kumar and ar and another vs. State of Haryana aryana and others”, whereby the petition wa ion was disposed of on the basis of s is of statement made by learned VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-2037-2025 (O & M) 2 counsel fo sel for the respondents to the eff he effect that “…in case, the petitioners ners feels that the posts against whi which they worked at one given point of ti of time still exists, in case, any su y such claim is raised by the petitioners ners by way of filing an appropria priate representation, the said claim will will be decided in accordance wit with law and an appropriate order will will be passed within a period of of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of a t of any such claim and in case, it is it is found feasible to grant the relief to th o the petitioners, the same will be e be extended to them otherwise, due reason asons for not accepting the claim laim of the petitioners will be mentioned ned in the speaking order so passed ssed, which will be conveyed to the petitio titioners. Learned counsel for the r the petitioners submits that keeping in g in view the statement made by e by learned counsel for the respondent dents, present petition may kindly b dly be disposed of having been not pressed essed any further with liberty to the the petitioners to approach the respondent dents by way of filing an appropriat riate representation…” It is submitted by learned coun d counsel for the petitioners that, in pursuan ursuance of the aforesaid order, a der, a representation was duly submitted, itted, which came to be accepted vi ted vide order dated 12.03.2025 (Annexure exure P-34), and the petitioners were were taken back into service as a Computer puter Data Entry Operator for the s the smooth functioning of the Kaithal For al Forest Division. However, shortly hortly thereafter, vide order dated

31.03.2025

3.2025 (Annexure P-35), the service services of the petitioners were terminated inated on the ground that upon re on review of the policy dated

30.06.2022

6.2022, the petitioners did not fulfill fulfill the prescribed conditions, and conseq onsequently, the earlier order dated 12 ated 12.03.2025 (Annexure P-34) VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-2037-2025 (O & M) 3 was withdr withdrawn. It is contended that such t such action is contrary to the directions i tions issued by the Writ Court. Per contra, learned counsel a nsel appearing on behalf of the State subm submits that the petitioners were en engaged on contractual basis and the req the requirements for the post of Comp Computer Data Entry Operator is not perman ermanent and varies from time to ti e to time. It is further submitted that as pe as per the prevailing Policy (An (Annexure P-36), contractual engagemen gements cannot be made through outs h outsourcing and are required to be made on ade only through Haryana Kaushal R shal Rozgar Nigam Ltd. portal. It is, howeve owever, fairly stated that the petition etitioners are at liberty to apply through th gh the said mode and, if found el nd eligible, their case shall be considered idered in accordance with law. At this stage, learned counse ounsel for the petitioners draws attention to tion to the communication dated 18. ed 18.12.2025 (Annexure P-38), issued by t d by the Forest Department, Haryana aryana, whereby the case of the petitioner ioners has been recommended and t and the Deputy Conservator of Forests, K sts, Kaithal has directed that the p the portal of Haryana Kaushal Rozgar Nig ar Nigam Ltd. be opened to accommo ommodate the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the p or the parties. In view of the facts noticed a ticed above, this Court finds that the directio irection issued by the Writ Court was rt was limited for consideration of the claim o laim of the petitioners and passing o sing of a reasoned and speaking order. Adm r. Admittedly, the representation of on of the petitioners has been considered idered and appropriate orders have be ave been passed. The subsequent grievance, ance, if any, arising out of withd withdrawal of the benefit or VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-2037-2025 (O & M) 4 termination ination of services, would give rise t rise to a fresh cause of action, which cann h cannot be adjudicated in the present resent contempt proceedings. Accordingly, no case for w for willful disobedience of the order passe r passed by the Writ Court is made out de out. Consequently, the present cont nt contempt petition is dismissed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any if any, shall also stand disposed of. 9, 2026 March 19 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document