CRM-M No. 25262 of 2022 · Punjab & Haryana High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 01 May 2024
- Bench
- ANOOP CHITKARA
- Neutral citation
- 2024:PHHC:59876
Outcome
Disposed of
The present petition is disposed of, having been withdrawn with liberty
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The present petition is disposed of, having been withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one in accordance with law. It is clarified that since there is no ASHWANI KUMAR 2024.05.03 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh 1…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25262-2022 (O&M) Date of order: 01.05.2024 ... Petitioner(s) …Respondent (s) Tejinder Kumar & another Sudhir Goyal Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Ayush Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Nirmal Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Aditya Grover, Advocate for the respondent. *** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. Complaint No. COMA/200/2019 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, District Ludhiana. Court Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jagraon Seeking quashing of complaint captioned above along with summoning order dated 10.1.2019 (Annexure P-2), the petitioner has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 482 CrPC.
Counsel for the respondent has opposed the present petition by referring to paragraph 12 of the present petition.
However, counsel for the petitioners submits that it is a bona fide error and not intentional. He seeks withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one.
Operative part
The present petition is disposed of, having been withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one in accordance with law. It is clarified that since there is no ASHWANI KUMAR 2024.05.03 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh 1 CRM-M-25262-2022 2024:PHHC: 059876 (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1) adjudication on merits, the contents of the present petition be not treated against the petitioner as evidence in any proceedings. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE May 01, 2024 AK Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes No ASHWANI KUMAR 2024.05.03 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The present petition is disposed of, having been withdrawn with liberty
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 138; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 01 May 2024. The bench was ANOOP CHITKARA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.