✦ High Court of India · 30 Jun 2010

I N v. St at eofPunj aband ot hers

Case Details High Court of India · 30 Jun 2010
Court
High Court of India
Decided
30 Jun 2010
Bench
Not available
Length
2,580 words

passedin t he first counselingand who had not passedPunj abit ill 22009 and also t he candidat eswho had not 14 t he fce and ae willingt o 4 dcpositlhe fee were furt her callccl for Oll 192009 The pct it ionershave challengedt he publicnot ice dat ed 2332009 whereby 17009 t he condit ion of 50010and45I o m arks for General and Reserved Cat egories int roducedas eligibililvfor adm ission t o ETT course The cont ent ion of t he 1S t hal by 1SSUIng publicnot ices t he originaladvert isem entnot ice is soughtt o be am endcd which is in law Thc St at ehas filed a det ailed replyI t is slat ed t hat t he originalpublicnot ices dalcd 1672008 and 231 009 fact not t he advert isem enlnolicesfhese not ices were issued onlyfor collect ion ofinfonnat iont o ident ifyeligiblecandidat es from EGS volunt eers I t is furt herst at ed t hat t he publicnot ices dat ed 232009 and 1782009 t houghissuedbyway 01 bul ln fact t he publicnot ices laid down t he for adm ision for Teacher Training Furt hcr st and of t he St ale is t hal eligibilit ycondit ionshave been laid down by t he NCTE t hc apex body which regulat est he iinpart ingof ETT and olher Tcacher TrainingCourses 111t he count ry The St at c has also placedon record Annexure Rl which is Appendix2 of t hc nonns st andards for Teacher issued by t he NCTE Under 2 00 t he said not ificat ion t he for adm ission t o I 3Ed Coursc are Anit a Rani 2014.04.02 12: 59 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh The condit ion readsas underl Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 63 V 1 t r 0 C0 0 C9 Z I 4 Z a r I 00 m e0 Z t l CWP Nos13531 17355 12463 12525 13717 13801 14704 12289and 14702of2009 7 32 Eligibilit y 322 Candidat e wit h at least 500I om arks in t he seniorit ysecondary 32 The reservat ion for SCI STI OBC and ot her shall be as per t he rlllcs of t he Cent ral Govem m ent lSt at eGovernm ent whichever is There shall be relaxat ion of 50I om arks 111favour of SCI STI OBC and ot her cat egoriesof candidat es95 Thought he St at e relied upon t he nornls by t he NCTE however lhe NCTE was not a part yt o t he pet it ionVide order dat ed 201 02009 passedin som e of t he wril pet it ionsi ncluding CWPN012463 of 2009 NCTE was as part y askedt o flleit s replyNCTE hasalso 61edit s reply t hest andof t heSt at eas regardt he eligibilit y for adm ission t o lhe course lt is st at edlhat under 2005 and norm s and st andardfor Elem ent ary Teacher t he cligibilit y was at least 450I oinarksin t he or it s exam inat ion Howcver t hese subst it ut edby 2007 wherein t he m inim um m arks were al least 500I oin t he Sr SecoildaryI xam inalion wit h relaxat ionof 50I om arks in case of ReservedCat egoriesln VI CW of t hc above st and f t he NCTI 3 t he eligibilit yprescribcdby t hc St at e vide it s dat ed237009 and 782009 cannot be said t o be illegalI t 1S alsorelevant t o not ice t hat t he first t wo publicnolices dat ed167 2008 and 232009 m ent ionabout t he inform at ion t o ident ifyt he Anit a Rani 2014.04.02 12: 59 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh eligiblecandidat es Paragraph2 of t he aforesaid publicnot ice reads as Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 64 a f 0 CA0 I C5 I Z r I 06 CCl W2 Z r 4 CWP Nos13531173551246312525137171380114704 12289and 14702 of2009 8 underl The eligibilit yand ident it yfor eligiblecandidat esfor adm ission t o ETT Cours I t is evident t hat public not ice dat ed 233 2009 prescribest he m lnim um for General and ReservedCat cgoricsLcarned counsel t he pet it ionershas relicd upon t wo oft his Courl 111t he case of Subhash Chandra VSe The I nst it ut e of Medical Educat ion and Research Chandigarhand anot her 1997 RSJ 346 it been held t hat t he adm issionbrochure cannot bc perm iuedt o be am endedor alt ered at lhe st ageA sim ilar view has been held in t he case of Munish Khanduj avse Guru Jam bheshwlar Universit yHisar and ot hcrs 200231RSJ63 I n t he presentcasc t he quest ionis of t he eligibilit yThe flrst t wo publicnot icesrelied upon by t he are 111 fact not t he brochure for adm ission The C condilionin t he aforesaidnot ices is regardingt he infonnalion in respectoft he eligibilit y oft he EGS Volunt eers These not ices were followedbyt wo publicnot ices layingdown t he eligibilit yas per t he norm s laid down lI yt he NCTE I t lS also pert inentt o not e t hat as per t he replyfiled by t he NCTE t hese eligibilit ycondit ions have been laid down by t he st alut ory fram ed by t he NCTE The st at ut orycondit ion laid clown cannot be wit h These condit ions have t o be followed beingessenlial eligibilit yfor adm ission t o t he course These pet it ionswerc filed for adm ission t o t he Course duringt he sesst on 2009e2010 I t is m olle t han one year Ot herwise also at t his belat ed st age 110 relief can bc grant edt o t he pet it ionersln CWP Nosl2525 and Anit a Rani 2014.04.02 12: 59 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh 13713of 2009 t he pet it ionershave also placedon record a publicnot ice Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document r 6 j 1 1 1 Lr 0 0 I 0 I Z 5 e t r 08 Oo 3 Z Clm CWP Nose1353117355 12463 12525 1371713801 14704 12289and14702of2009 9 dat ed 262201 0 wherein t he EGS volunt eers have bcen given speciil chance t o im prove t he percent ageI t is cont ended on behalf of t he pet it ionerst hat t he pe t it ioners are ent it led t o im provet heir perccnt ageand t heym ay be perm it t edt o do SO Suffle it t o say t hat if t he pet it ionersare cnt it led t o im provet heir percent ageint erm s of t hc aforem ent ionedpublic not ice t heyare at libert yt o do SO Oil t heir percent age t heywil l ot hcrwisebecom e eligiblet o applyand seek adinlssion t o t he Course However t his is possibleonlyfor fut ure adm issions The Currenl Academ ic Session com m enced m orc t han one year back and t hus t he pet it ioners are not ent it ledt o seek any I oenefitof t his publicnot ice at t his st age I n vicw of t he abovc I Ond 110 m erit in t hese writ I et it ions Dism issed No order as t o cost s Copyoft his orderbe placedon record on each concernedSI e 3 0 6 2010 MFK 1Q0 1PERMODKOHLI I JUDGE C 1 4 Not elWhet her t o be rerred t o report eror not YESI NO 0 1 b Lf I V Anit a Rani 2014.04.02 12: 59 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments