Nasib Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. JEYAPAUL. Present:- Mr. Kartar Singh Malik-I, Advocate, for the petitioner. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this criminal revision petition with liberty to file an appeal on behalf of the victim as provided under Section 372 Cr.P.C. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE March 23, 2011. sjks.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 372.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 23 Mar 2011. The bench was SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, M JEYAPAUL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.