Court on its own motion v. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 148, 149, 323, 325, 342, 364, 367, 506
- Arms Act, 1959
Judgment
Operative part
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1322 of 2010 Date of Decision: 17.1.2011 Court on its own motion State of Punjab …Petitioner Versus …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: By post. Mr. B.S. Sra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) A telegram was received by this Court on 13.7.2010 and the same has been treated as a Criminal Writ Petition, wherein it is stated that Major Singh was picked up by the police. In response thereto, an affidavit has been filed by Jasdev Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dalha Police, District Ludhiana (Rural), wherein it is stated that Major Singh was arrested in case FIR No. 298 dated 7.11.2009, registered at Police Station Jagraon, under Sections 364, 325, 367, 323, 342, 506, 148 and 149 IPC and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. It is further stated that lateron Major Singh was granted regular bail by this Court, vide order dated 9.7.2010, passed in Criminal Misc. No. M-15568 of 2010. Since the custody of Major Singh was in accordance with the Criminal Writ Petition No. 1322 of 2010 2 provisions of law, no further directions are called for, the present writ petition is disposed of. January 17, 2011 “DK” (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 148, 149, 323, 325, 342, 364, 367, 506; Arms Act, 1959.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 17 Jan 2011. The bench was KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.