RAVI ALIAS PARSA v. STATE OF HARYANA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the present appeal stands dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) JUDGE 29th August 2024 simran Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No SIMRANDEEP KAUR 2024.09.02 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Present: Mr. Rajat Mor, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Kirpal Singh Thakur, AAG, Haryana, assisted by SI Dinesh Kumar. HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (ORAL)
#1. Initially, the petitioner had filed a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.965 dated 20.09.2018, under Section 346 IPC, 1860; Sections 343, 354-C, 354-D, 365, 376(2)(n), 506 IPC and Section 3 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1989’), added later on registered at Police Station Sadar Hisar, District Hisar (Annexure P-1).
#2. However, as per the order dated 15.04.2024, the application for treating the main petition as an ‘appeal’, filed under Section 14-A of the Act of 1989, was allowed and the petition was ordered to be treated as an appeal.
#3. As per office report, notice of the appeal, issued to respondent No.2, is served.
#4. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner was earlier allowed and he was ordered to be released on bail in terms of the order dated 18.07.2019, passed by the Additional SIMRANDEEP KAUR 2024.09.02 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRA-S-1803-2024 (O&M) (cid:2) Sessions Judge, Hisar (Annexure P-2). However, due to unavoidable circumstances, the appellant could not appear during the COVID period, as such, the bail order was cancelled and the appellant was arrested on 29.05.2023.
#5. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw the present appeal and seeks liberty to approach the trial Court as there is change of circumstances after dismissal of the bail application by the Additional Sessions Judge, vide order dated 10.07.2023 (Annexure P-9).
#6. In view of the above, the present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
#7. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) JUDGE 29th August 2024 simran Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No SIMRANDEEP KAUR 2024.09.02 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the present appeal stands dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 346; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — s. 3.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 29 Aug 2024. The bench was HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.