JOSHI v. UT CHANDIGARH ....R & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- HARKESH MAN MANUJA
Provisions considered
Judgment
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH ESH MANUJA Mr. Pulkit Sachdeva, Advocate Present: Mr. for the petitioner. for th Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Addl. PP UT, C Mr. A UT, Chandigarh. HARKESH MAN MANUJA, J. (Oral) **** By way of present petition filed unde By w d under Section 482 Cr.P.C., prayer ayer has been made for for quashing of order dated 11.0 d 11.01.2022 passed by the Judici Judicial Magistrate Ist C Ist Class, Chandigarh thereby dism y dismissing the application bearin bearing No.CRM-431-202 2021 dated 02.09.2021 filed at the at the instance of the petitioner und er under Section 156(3) Cr (3) Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner Lear submits that since the parties hav ies have compromised the ed the matter, therefore, petitioner m ner may be permitted to withdraw th raw the ition. present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. Dism May 20, 2024 Atik (HARKESH MANUJA) (HA JUDGE Whe Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Whe Yes/N Yes/No Yes/No Yes/N MOHMED ATIK 2024.05.20 18:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.