ROHIT GAHLYAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
SCC 303, this petition is allowed and
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 110, 115, 351(3)
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose…
- Para 66. ples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment ples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the princi Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in Kulwinder Singh…
- Para 77. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. of, accordingly.
Judgment
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate Present: Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate for the petitioner. for the petitioner. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. J.S. Thakur, Advocate Mr. J.S. Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.2. for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
Bharatiya Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 FIR No.318, dated for quashing of FIR No.318, dated
12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 Sonipat, District Sonipat (Annexure P-1) and Sonipat, District Sonipat (Annexure P nt proceedings arising 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 28.02.2026 (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of
28.02.2026 (Annexure P-2).
This Court vide order dated 10.04.2026 This had directed the parties 10.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded gistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness gistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness and the learned Ma of the compromise. of the compromise.
Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sonepat and got their statements recorded. On and got their statements recorded. On Judicial Magistrate First Class GURPREET 2026.05.06 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-19735 19735-2026 2 Judicial Magistrate First Class, the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Judicial Magistrate First Class, the basis of the statement Sonepat has submitted report dated has submitted report dated 28.04.2026 to the effect that the 28.04.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. any coercion or undue influence.
as counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 as counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel as well have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
Operative part
ples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment ples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the princi Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.318, dated 12.10.2025, under , this petition is allowed and FIR No.318, dated 12.10.2025, under FIR No.318, dated 12.10.2025, under Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 Sonipat, District Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 Sonipat, District Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 Sonipat, District Sections 110, 115, 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Sector 27 Sonipat, District subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the Sonipat (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the Sonipat (Annexure P basis of compromise compromise dated 28.02.2026 (Annexure P (Annexure P-2) are quashed.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. of, accordingly.
05.05.2026 Gurpreet (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No GURPREET 2026.05.06 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: SCC 303, this petition is allowed and
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 110, 115, 351(3).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 05 May 2026. The bench was RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.