Judgment · High Court · 2012
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 26 Apr 2012
- Bench
- PARAMJEET SINGH
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-9369 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.04.2012 Hansa alias Hans Raj and another State of Punjab Versus .... Petitioners .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present:- Mr. Rajnish K. Jindal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Bhullar, AAG, Punjab PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.21 dated
03.02.2012, registered at Police Station Gobindgarh Mandi, under Sections 307 and 34 IPC. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This court, while issuing notice of motion on March 30, 2012 directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioners would be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer or the concerned Court, as the case may be, in connection with abovesaid case FIR. On instructions from ASI Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for respondent-State informs that in pursuance of order dated March 30, 2012, Crl. Misc. No.M-9369 of 2012 (O&M) -2- petitioners have joined the investigation and are no more required for interrogation. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated March 30, 2012 passed by this Court is made absolute. Petition disposed of accordingly.
26.04.2012 vcgarg (PARAMJEET SINGH) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 307.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 26 Apr 2012. The bench was PARAMJEET SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.