Soni Electrical and Electronics v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement ? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M. KUMAR,J. In respect of detained goods the Assistant Excise…
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present: Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Sudipti Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab
Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement ? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M. KUMAR,J. In respect of detained goods the Assistant Excise & Taxation Commissioner (Mobile Wing) Amritsar has passed an order on 15.7.2009 imposing penalty. The aforesaid order is an appealable order with further remedy before the Tribunal. Accordingly, the petitioner may avail the remedy as provided by laws. The writ petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise all the issues raised in the instant petition before the appellate authority as well as before the Tribunal. (M.M.Kumar) Judge
16.7.2009. (Jaswant Singh) Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.