✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 15 Dec 2006

M/s Abhishek Tea Company Ltd., Amritsar v. State of Punjab & Ors.

VS. C.W.P No. 17205 of 2006ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, RAJESH BINDAL

Case at a glance

Judgment

Mr. Avneesh Jhingan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, AAG, Punjab. ----- ORDER: This writ petition has been filed for directions to refund the amount of penalty, which was imposed against the petitioner, but was set-aside on appeal. Case of the petitioner is that on 31.3.1997, penalty of Rs. 80,300/- was imposed under Section 14B(7) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (for short, “the Act”), alleging attempt at evasion of tax at the Check-Post. On appeal, this order was set-aside on 11.1.1999. Inspite of this, the amount of penalty which was deposited by the petitioner, was not refunded as required under the provisions of Section 12 of the Act. After this petition was filed, the amount has been refunded without interest. We have already examined the legal position with reference to relevant provisions in C.W.P. No.4322 of 2006 M/s M. Paul Babuta Engineers and Contractors v. State of Punjab and others and held that in such a situation, interest is payable as per statutory provisions. C.W.P. No.17205 of 2006 -2- In view of above, we direct respondent No.3 to pay the amount of statutory interest within one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Respondents will be at liberty to recover the amount from any erring official. ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE December 15, 2006 ashwani (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. VS. C.W.P No. 17205 of 2006). ← Search more judgments