Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 16 Mar 2011
- Bench
- NIRMALJIT KAUR
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance…
Judgment
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. G.S. Nahal, Advocate for the petitioners. ****
Operative part
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondents No.4 to 7 not to interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners. The petitioners along with their counsel are present in the Court. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievances of the petitioners and if found necessary, take appropriate measures in accordance with law.
16.3.2011 rajeev ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 16 Mar 2011. The bench was NIRMALJIT KAUR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.