JAB AND HARYANA AT v. UNION OF IND
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK EPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA HO Present : Mr Mr. Prashant Kapila, Advocate for PITA BANERJI for the petitioner. DEEPAK SIBA SIBAL, J. (Oral) *** Learned counsel for the petition Lea etitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with lib ith liberty to file a fresh one on the sam the same cause of action as also to challenge therei therein Section 147A of the Income T ome Tax Act, 1961. Dismissed as withdrawn with libert Dis liberty as prayed for. (DEEPAK JU JUDGE EPAK SIBAL)
06.05.2026 Prince rtable : Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No soned: Whether Reasoned: PITA BANERJI) (LAPITA JUDGE JU PRINCE SAINI 2026.05.08 09:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.