Salochna Devi & Anr. v. Anil Kakkar

Present:- Mr. Ramneek Vasudeva, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of direction to the Executing Court, to not proceed further with the execution petition bearing No.290 of 2025, arising from the eviction petition i.e. Rent Petition No.5 of 2017, titled ‘Salochna Devi and another Vs. Anil Kakkar’. It is submitted by the counsel that even though, the petitioner has filed the rent appeal i.e. RA/7/2025 and along with the same, an application for stay has also been filed, but however, learned Appellate Authority is not hearing the appeal and even, no order is passed qua the stay application, even though, the respondent had made appearance in the same. Keeping in view the submissions aforesaid and taking into consideration the fact of the appeal having been filed and the stay application also pending adjudication, learned Appellate Authority is HIMANSHU VATS 2026.04.08 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CR-3011-2026 2 hereby requested to look into the matter and pass an appropriate order, with regard to disposal of the stay application, on the next date of hearing, or within ten days thereafter. In view of the aforesaid terms, the civil revision petition stands disposed of. However, without prejudice to the rights of the parties, to be adjudicated in the appeal, the execution proceedings shall remain stayed, only for the period, till effective order is passed in the stay application, by learned Appellate Authority.

08.04.2026 Himanshu Vats (ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes Yes/No HIMANSHU VATS 2026.04.08 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document