✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 31 Aug 2006

AUGUST 31 v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 13831 of 2006JASBIR SINGH, PRITAM PAL

Case at a glance

Decided
31 Aug 2006
Bench
JASBIR SINGH, PRITAM PAL

Provisions considered

Judgment

Cause title

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITAM PAL PRESENT:

Mr. Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate, for the petitioner. JASBIR SINGH, J. (oral)

JUDGMENT:

By making a complaint before the Deputy Commissioner, it has been said by the petitioner that in view of disqualification prescribed under Section 175(1)(q) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, respondent No. 3 is liable to be removed from the office of Sarpanch. This Court feels that in view or ordinance dated August 17, 2006, vide which above mentioned provision has been deleted from the statute w.e.f. January 1, 2005, Deputy Commissioner has no power to pass any order, what-so-ever in that regard. In view of the above circumstances, the writ petition stands disposed of. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge ( Pritam Pal ) Judge August 31, 2006. DKC

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 — s. 175(1)(q).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 31 Aug 2006. The bench was JASBIR SINGH, PRITAM PAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 13831 of 2006). ← Search more judgments