Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 438, 438(2)
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 336
- Arms Act, 1959 ss. 25, 27
Judgment
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.Hemant Saini, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition under section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail in a case registered against the petitioner under section 336 IPC and sections 25,27 of the Arms Act vide FIR No.13 dated 7.2.2011 at police station Chheharta, Amritsar City. Learned State counsel (on instructions from ASI- Sarwan Singh, who is present in court) submits that pursuant to order dated 25.2.2011, the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated 25.2.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. Disposed of. April 05, 2011 JUDGE ( RAJAN GUPTA )
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 438, 438(2); Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 336; Arms Act, 1959 — ss. 25, 27.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 05 Apr 2011. The bench was RAJAN GUPTA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.