✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 28 Aug 2012

Criminal Misc. No. M-5735 of 2011 (O&M) v. State of Haryana & Ors.

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

Case at a glance

Order date
28 Aug 2012
Bench
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

Outcome

Withdrawn

for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kshitij Sharma, AAG, Haryana. Mr. D.N.Ganeriwala, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 7. **** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL) Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of the investigation agency, the petitioner has approached this Court, by way of instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., invoking its inherent jurisdiction, for staying the inquiry by the District Police or hand over the investigation to some other independent agency to conclude the investigation in FIR No. 746 dated 9.11.2010 under Sections 368, 506, 34 IPC, registered at Police Station City Sirsa. Notice of motion was issued and pursuant thereto, reply by way of affidavit dated 15.3.2011 of Puran Chand, Deputy Superintendent of Police (Head Quarter), was filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that since during the pendency of this petition, investigation has been concluded and report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been filed before the court, it has become infructuous and he does not intend to press this petition. He seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE

28.8.2012 Ak Sharma

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 173, 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 368, 506.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 28 Aug 2012. The bench was RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments