✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 23 Oct 2006

Dr.S.S.Sandhu v. State of Punjab & Ors.

CWP No. 13130 of 2006JASBIR SINGH, PRITAM PAL

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

The writ petition is allowed in above mentioned terms

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITAM PAL Present: Shri Kanwaljit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Shri P.S.Chhina, Additional Advocate General, Punjab Shri Padam Jain, Advocate for respondent No.3 Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) Vide order dated 31.3.2003 (Annexure P/6), property of the petitioner was re-assessed regarding house tax. Appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed, vide order dated 13.6.2006 (Annexure P/10), primarily on the ground that before filing the appeal, he has failed to deposit the amount of house tax assessed, which was mandatory under the provisions of Section 147 of the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976. Counsel for the petitioner very fairly states that the petitioner shall deposit the entire amount of house tax assessed, which was payable at the time when the appeal was filed, within a period of one month from today. In view of above undertaking given, we feel that the order passed by the appellate authority deserves to be set aside and in case the petitioner CWP No.13130 of 2006 - 2 - deposits the amount of house tax, which was due at the time when the appeal was filed, within a month from today, the appellate authority shall re- hear the appeal on merits and pass order, as per law. If the amount is not deposited, as mentioned above, this writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed. The writ petition is allowed in above mentioned terms. Parties are directed to appear before the appellate authority on

27.11.2006. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge October 23, 2006 ( Pritam Pal ) gk Judge

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is allowed in above mentioned terms

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 — s. 147.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 23 Oct 2006. The bench was JASBIR SINGH, PRITAM PAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CWP No. 13130 of 2006). ← Search more judgments