Gita Convent School & Anr. v. Haryana Urban Development Authority & Ors.
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. Aashish Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate, for the respondents.
1.
Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. For orders see C.W.P. No. 11416 of 2007. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JORA SINGH) JUDGE February 24, 2009 Pkapoor
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 12273 of 2007).
← Search more judgments