✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 12 Dec 2012

Milkha Singh v. State of Punjab

DAYA CHAUDHARY

Case at a glance

Decided
12 Dec 2012
Bench
DAYA CHAUDHARY

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed

Judgment

Mr. J.B.S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. ---- Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral). The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.168 dated 24.10.2012 under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur. Admittedly, the challan has not been presented and this petition has been filed for grant of regular bail. The petitioner is having remedy, in case, the challan is presented within the prescribed period, no ground is made out to grant regular bail at this stage.

Operative part

12.12.2012 sonika Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 12 Dec 2012. The bench was DAYA CHAUDHARY.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments