✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 10 Mar 2010

Crl. Misc. No. M – 517 of 2010(O&M) v. Punjab Greenfield Resources Ltd

GURDEV SINGH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Judgment

Operative part

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Sr.Advocate, with Ms. Sukhwinder Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he does not want to press this petition and wants to file a revision against the summoning order and that this petition be dismissed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners to file such a revision. Allowed. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the revisional Court while deciding the application, if any, for condonation of delay shall take into consideration the fact that the petitioners have filed the present petition before this Court against the same summoning order. March 10, 2010 tripti (Gurdev Singh) Judge

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 10 Mar 2010. The bench was GURDEV SINGH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments