✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 09 Feb 2012

Criminal Misc. No. M- 3743 of 2012 v. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral)

KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

Case at a glance

Order date
09 Feb 2012
Bench
KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

Judgment

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M- 3743 of 2012 Date of Decision: 9.2.2012 Tofiq State of Haryana Versus ... Petitioner ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. S.K.Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case arising out of FIR No. 17 dated 20.1.2012, registered at Police Station Farakpur, District Yamuna Nagar, under Sections 279, 336, 420, 473, 467, 468 & 471 IPC, Section11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and Section 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. He submits that the trial Court be directed to decide the regular bail application of the petitioner within a stipulated time. As prayed, dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is observed that in case, the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court, on or before Criminal Misc. No. M- 3743 of 2012 2

17.2.2012, his application, for grant of regular bail, shall be decided within three days after the period of his police remand is over. February 9, 2012 “DK” (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 279, 336, 420, 467, 468, 471, 473; Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 — s. 11; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 181.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 09 Feb 2012. The bench was KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments