03.2025 M/s Rubykon Manufacturing Company v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 28 Mar 2025
- Bench
- ARUN PALLI, SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pridhi Jaswinder, Senior Standing counsel for the respondents. ARUN PALLI, J (Oral) Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw the petition, to enable the petitioner to assail the impugned order dated December 03, 2024, by way of an appeal under Section 107 the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE
28.03.2025 deepak Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2025.03.29 12:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — s. 107.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 28 Mar 2025. The bench was ARUN PALLI, SUDEEPTI SHARMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.