✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 11 Feb 2009

Criminal Misc. No. M-3958 of 2009 (O&M) v. State of Punjab & Ors.

HARBANS LAL

Case at a glance

Decided
11 Feb 2009
Bench
HARBANS LAL

Outcome

Dismissed

Sequelly, this petition is dismissed

Judgment

Operative part

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARBANS LAL Present:- Mr. Munish Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. **** JUDGMENT HARBANS LAL, J. This petition has been moved by Mohan Chand under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for setting aside the impugned order dated 4.12.2008 Annexure P.1 passed by respondent No.1 and for holding that the petitioner is entitled to temporary release under Section 3 of the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962 for four weeks parole to meet the members of his family and to attend his ailing aged parents. The brief facts are that the petitioner was involved in the case registered vide FIR No.157/1998 under the provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, `the Act'). He was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years under the Act. He has completed all the short terms of imprisonment. Vide order dated 4.12.2008, respondent No.1 has rejected his prayer for grant of parole. In these premises, the impugned order be set aside and he may be released on parole for the period of four weeks. Criminal Misc. No. M-3958 of 2009 (O&M) -2- I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. As per Annexure P.1, the order dated 4.12.2008 passed by the Director General of Police, the District Magistrate did not recommend release of the petitioner on parole. The SSP in his report has stated that as many as four more cases under the Act are pending against him. It is further mentioned that the petitioner is a habitual dealer in narcotics and the cases have also been registered against his father. Taking into consideration the entirety of these facts, I do not deem it a fit case to grant parole to the petitioner as sought for. Sequelly, this petition is dismissed. February 11, 2009 ( HARBANS LAL ) JUDGE Whether to be referred to the Reporter? No

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Sequelly, this petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962 — s. 3; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 11 Feb 2009. The bench was HARBANS LAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments