Harbans Singh v. The State of Punjab & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 10 May 2010
- Bench
- KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Harbans Singh Crl. Misc. No.M-6600 of 2008 Date of decision : 10.05.2010 .... Petitioner VERSUS The State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. C.S. Bakshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Bhullar, AAG, Punjab, for respondent nos.1 to 6. Mr. Yogesh Goyal, Advocate, for respondent no.7. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral) During the course of arguments, it transpires that the impugned FIR was investigated and the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was submitted. Counsel for the petitioner prays that he be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all arguments before the trial Court at appropriate stage. As prayed, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that petitioner is an old man and the FIR was registered in the year 2006 and a period of 4 years is going to elapse. Taking into consideration the old age and the long Crl. Misc. No.M-6600 of 2008 -2- pendency of the litigation, personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is exempted subject to his filing an undertaking that he shall cause appearance as and when required by the trial Court. He shall also file an undertaking that the evidence, if any, recorded in his absence but in the presence of his counsel shall be binding upon him. The trial Court may also incorporate any other condition in the undertaking to be submitted by the petitioner.
10.05.2010 (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 173.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 10 May 2010. The bench was KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.