Tejbir Singh v. Sheetal
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
the present petition is allowed to be withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the present petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
Judgment
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr. Paramjit Sullar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Mrigank Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel submits that a petition under Section 18 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, has been filed before the competent Court at Gurdaspur.
In her statement, recorded separately today in the Court; respondent, Sheetal has categorically stated that she will have no objection if the petitioner comes to see their child, Mahi @ Gurpartap Singh, in the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Pathankot, between 12.00 noon to 3.00 p.m, on every Saturday.
In the above backdrop, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage and prays for withdrawal of the same.
Operative part
Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the present petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
Dismissed as withdrawn. October 16, 2012 PKapoor (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the present petition is allowed to be withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 — s. 18.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 16 Oct 2012. The bench was NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.