IGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYAN v. Gurugram Metropo
Judgment
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SI CORAM : HON'B HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BA HON'B AK SIBAL A BANERJI ..... Respondents Present : Mr. I. S I. S. Pabla, Advocate, for the petiti e petitioner. Mr. P. S. Saini, Advocate, and Mr. P. Mr. D. S. Saini, Advocate, for the resp Mr. D. e respondent-GMDA. DEEPAK SIBAL, J AL, J. (Oral) * * * * *
#1. Learne earned counsel for the petitioner seek er seeks to withdraw this petition to enable the petitione titioner to seek its remedy under the ar arbitration clause of the NIT in question.
#3. Dismis ismissed as withdrawn with liberty as erty as prayed for. t is clarified that while granting the a It is cla the afore liberty, we have neither commented on the n the merits nor the maintainability/e ility/entertainability of the remedy that the petitioner m oner may avail. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE
19.03.2026 shamsher Whether speaking/reasoned : : Whether reportable [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Yes / No s / No s / No Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.03.24 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.