✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 14 Jul 2026

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CGST COMMISSIONERATE ROHTAK & Anr. v. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral)

Cwp No. 13141 of 2026ACTING CHIEF, ROHIT KAPOOR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as

Provisions considered

Judgment

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. Mayank Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sagar Ratusaria, Junior Standing Counsel for the respondent(s)-CBIC. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral)

Operative part

1. Faced with the observations of the Court that the petitioner has a statutory alternative remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy by filing an appeal. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as

2. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

3. Since the writ petition was filed well within the period of limitation prescribed for filing an appeal, we provide that in the event an appeal is preferred within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered on merits without raising any objection with regard to limitation.

4. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE JULY 14, 2026 Rahul Joshi

1.

Whether Speaking/reasoned 2. Whether Reportable Yes/No Yes/No

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — s. 107.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 14 Jul 2026. The bench was ACTING CHIEF, ROHIT KAPOOR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Cwp No. 13141 of 2026). ← Search more judgments