CRM-M-13983 v. M/s Goyal Diary, Sunam

MANDEEP PANNU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Ms. Madhu Bala, Advocate for Ms. Madhu Bala, Advocate for , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S.Moudgil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. -.- MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral) MANDEEP PANNU J.

1. The instant petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned The instant petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned The instant petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned The instant petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 15.01.2026 ) passed by the learned Additional Sessions 15.01.2026 (Annexure P-2) passed by the learned Additional Sessions ) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, in case bearing No. CRA/ , in case bearing No. CRA/30/202 , whereby the petitioner has been /2026, whereby the petitioner has been directed to deposit 20% of the compensation amount. directed to deposit 20% of the compensation amount. directed to deposit 20% of the compensation amount.

2. and order on quantum of sentence dated Vide judgment of conviction and order on quantum of sentence dated and order on quantum of sentence dated Vide judgment of conviction , the petitioner passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sunam, the petitioner passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 19.12.2025 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous was convicted a rigorous imprisonment for a period of imprisonment for a period of 02 (equal to the cheque to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.6,00,000/- (equal to the cheque to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. years and to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. to the complainant, for commission of offence punishable under Section amount) to the complainant, for commission of offence punishable under Section to the complainant, for commission of offence punishable under Section to the complainant, for commission of offence punishable under Section t. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred an appeal 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred an appeal t. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred an appeal 138 of Negotiable Instruments Ac against the said judgment of conviction and order of sentence before the learned against the said judgment of conviction and order of sentence before the learned against the said judgment of conviction and order of sentence before the learned against the said judgment of conviction and order of sentence before the learned . The learned Appellate Court vide order Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad. The learned Appellate Court vide order . The learned Appellate Court vide order Additional Sessions Judge, dated 15.01.2026 , directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation 15.01.2026, directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation , directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount till the next date fixed before the said Court. amount till the next date fixed before the said Court. amount till the next date fixed before the said Court. TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.13 19:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-13983- -2026 (O&M) -2-

3. contends that the learned Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the learned Learned counsel for the petitioner Learned counsel for the petitioner ght perspective and lower Appellate Court failed to appreciate the facts in the right perspective and lower Appellate Court failed to appreciate the facts in the ri lower Appellate Court failed to appreciate the facts in the ri imposed the condition to deposit 20% of the compensation and such a condition is imposed the condition to deposit 20% of the compensation and such a condition is imposed the condition to deposit 20% of the compensation and such a condition is imposed the condition to deposit 20% of the compensation and such a condition is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the law as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the law as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the law as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the law as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Jamboo Bhandari vs. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Jamboo Bhandari vs. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporat Jamboo Bhandari vs. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporat Court in Jamboo Bhandari vs. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporat