Criminal Misc. No.M- 31351 of 2011 (O&M) v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 14 Aug 2012
- Bench
- SABINA
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 319, 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 148, 149, 201, 302, 307, 323, 324, 326, 452, 506
- Arms Act, 1959 s. 27
Judgment
Operative part
Present: Mr. G.S.Punia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Amandeep Singh Rai, DAG, Punjab. **** SABINA, J. This petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C. for short) for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.56 dated 5.6.2008 under Sections 302/ 307/ 324/ 323/452/ 506/ 201/ 148/ 149/ 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Bhadson District Patiala. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since June 2008 and trial has still not been concluded. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that the challan was presented against fifteen accused. Thereafter, an application was moved by the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and six persons were summoned to face the trial as Criminal Misc. No.M- 31351 of 2011 (O&M) -2- additional accused. However, in revision filed by the said persons, challenging the order passed against them under Section 319 Cr.P.C., the said order was set aside qua five persons. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves to be dismissed. The allegations levelled against the petitioner are serious in nature. Two persons had died on account of the gun shots fired by the petitioner, whereas, two persons had suffered injuries. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. August 14, 2012 (SABINA) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 319, 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 148, 149, 201, 302, 307, 323, 324, 326, 452, 506; Arms Act, 1959 — s. 27.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 14 Aug 2012. The bench was SABINA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.