Crl. Misc. No. M-30725 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: October 01 & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 01 Oct 2012
- Bench
- PARAMJEET SINGH
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Shri Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Paramjeet Singh , J. (Oral): Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for the issuance of a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from respondents No.4 to 9. The petitioners assert that they are major and as there is no legal impediment, they have got married. They have already moved a representation dated 25.9.2012 (Annexure P-5) before respondent No.2 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala for protecting their life and liberty. Without commenting on the legality or validity of the marriage, the instant petition is being disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioners to approach respondent No.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala for protection, as per instructions dated 18.8.2010 issued by the Home Department, Punjab. Petitioners may not be arrested and adequate security be provided to them, if required. October 01, 2012. kadyan [ Paramjeet Singh ] Judge
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 01 Oct 2012. The bench was PARAMJEET SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.