✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court

Gurmeet Singh v. State of Punjab

CRM-M No. 3095 of 2011AJAY TEWARI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Present : Mr.S.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. U.S. Dhaliwal, Addl.A.G., Punjab. ******* This is a petition for regular bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 285 dated 18.10.2010, under Sections 307/323/324/34 and 427 IPC, registered at Police Station City Faridkot, District Faridkot. Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner has now been in custody for almost five months. The complainant has been discharged from the hospital and the investigation has been completed. Learned Addl. AG, on instructions from ASI Jaspal Singh, has accepted these factual assertions. In the circumstances without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Faridkot. Petition stands disposed of. March 25, 2011 sunita ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 307, 323, 324, 427.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM-M No. 3095 of 2011). ← Search more judgments