Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-30321 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: December 08 v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition is disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 438, 438(2)
- Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 s. 13(2)
Judgment
Operative part
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr.S.S.Gill, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. A.S.Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab *** Gurdev Singh, J. Heard. This petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by Satnam Singh Nagra, petitioner, for the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 183 dated 13.6.2011 registered under Sections 409, 465, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, in Police Station Sadar, Patiala. He was allowed interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 17.10.2011 subject to the conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.. On instructions from Vasdev, ASI, it has been submitted by State counsel that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and is no more required for further investigation. In these circumstances, the order dated 17.10.2011, is hereby made absolute. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE December 08, 2011 PARAMJIT
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 438, 438(2); Indian Penal Code, 1860; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — s. 13(2).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 08 Dec 2011. The bench was GURDEV SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.