✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 07 Jul 2010

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Banga Road v. Mohinder Kaur & Ors.

FAO No. 1671 of 2001K KANNAN

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The liability of the Insurance Co in a case of a fake licence or a renewal of a licence which was a fake one have been considered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in several cases and the decisions in National Insurance Co v Swaran…

Judgment

Present: Mr. N.K. Khosla, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) -.-

1.

The Insurance Co is in appeal against the judgment of the MACT contending that in spite of the fact that the driver who drove the vehicle was proved to have had a fake driving licence, the liability is wrongly cast on it.

2.

The liability of the Insurance Co in a case of a fake licence or a renewal of a licence which was a fake one have been considered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in several cases and the decisions in National Insurance Co v Swaran Singh (2004) 3 SCC 297 and United Indian Insurance v Divinder Singh (2007) 8 SCC 342 are instructive. In the latter judgment, it has been held that a renewal of a fake driving licence is no licence at all and hence the insurer FAO No.1671 of 2001 -2- shall not be liable.

3.

The Tribunal has rejected the contention of the insurer on the ground that even if the licence were to be fake, the insurer is still liable. While the liability to satisfy the claim of the claim could be upheld, the Tribunal ought to have provide for a right of recovery against the insure. The same has not been done. FAO No.1671 of 2001 -3-

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. FAO No. 1671 of 2001). ← Search more judgments