2.2011 Kewal Singh & Ors. v. The State of Punjab & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 323, 324, 326
Judgment
Operative part
HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present : Mr. D.R. Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** RITU BAHRI, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No. 99 dated 13.6.2008 under Sections 323, 324, 34 IPC lateron added Section 326 IPC registered at Police Station Nayanwala, District Bhatinda and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise. In compliance of the order dated 8.12.2010, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bathinda has sent a report. As per the report, all the injured and affected parties appeared in the Court and got recorded their statements. As per the statements recorded, the compromise is held genuine, which has been effected without any CRM No. M-29080 of 2010 coercion or pressure. -2- Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Amarjit Singh states that the matter has been compromised. In view of the status report and the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR(crl.) 1052, FIR No. 99 dated 13.6.2008 under Sections 323, 324, 34 IPC lateron added Section 326 IPC registered at Police Station Nayanwala, District Bhatinda with all consequential proceedings arising out of the same qua petitioners are quashed. The petition stands disposed of.
11.2.2011 'sp' (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 323, 324, 326.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 11 Feb 2011. The bench was RITU BAHRI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.