HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No. 69987-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 9 v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 09 Nov 2006
- Bench
- SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ss. 7, 12(2)
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ...RESPONDENTS Present: Mr.Gurcharan Dass , Advocate, for the petitioner. ... The petitioner, who is the complainant, has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuing directions to respondents No.3 and 4 to conclude the investigation in cse FIR No.38 dated 29.8.2005 registered under Sections 7,12(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 at P.S.Vigilance Bureau, District Ludhiana. After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the investigating agency to expedite the investigation in the aforesaid case. November 9, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — ss. 7, 12(2).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 09 Nov 2006. The bench was SATISH KUMAR MITTAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.