Biyas Dev & Anr. v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 10 Dec 2009
- Bench
- NIRMALJIT KAUR
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 148, 149, 326, 341, 342, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? To be referred to the Reporter or not? Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is made to the grant of regular…
Judgment
Mr. Mohinder Singh Joshi, Advocate with Mr. Harmesh Lal Rayat, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent Mr. Indresh Goel, Advocate for the complainant -.-
Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? To be referred to the Reporter or not? Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is made to the grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. to the petitioners in FIR No. 278 dated 02.07.2009 registered under Section 342, 326, 341, 506, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Phase I Mohali. It is stated that the challan has already been presented. The CRM No. M 30145 of 2009 2 petitioners are in custody since 13.09.2009. In view of the above, the petitioners be released on bail to the satisfaction of Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Mohali. Disposed of accordingly. December 10, 2009 (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 148, 149, 326, 341, 342, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 10 Dec 2009. The bench was NIRMALJIT KAUR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.