Sukhmander Singh v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 06 Sep 2012
- Bench
- SABINA
Provisions considered
Judgment
Present: Mr. I.S.Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 566 dated 28.12.2010 under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bhatinda, District Bhatinda. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves dismissal. Petitioner had absented during trial on 20.3.2012 without any sufficient cause. In these circumstance, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made out. Dismissed. September 06, 2012 Gurpreet (SABINA) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — s. 22.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 06 Sep 2012. The bench was SABINA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.