Criminal Misc.30279-M of 2008 v. STATE OF PUNJAB
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
petition is allowed
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. BS Kathuria, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed praying for interim bail to petitioner-Darbara Singh son of Karnail Singh in FIR No.258 dated 14.9.2005 under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station, Barnala. It has been pleaded that marriage of daughter of the petitioner is scheduled for 29.11.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that earlier also, the petitioner had sought interim bail, however, in deference to the orders of the court, the petitioner had surrendered. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from ASI Sampuran Singh, states that the fact has been verified and the daughter Criminal Misc.30279-M of 2008 2 of the petitioner is scheduled to be married on 29.11.2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petitioner would be required to surrender on 2.12.2008. Heavy surety. A copy of the order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Secretary. November 26, 2008 Kang ( AJAI LAMBA ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — s. 15.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 26 Nov 2008. The bench was AJAI LAMBA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.