✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 06 Nov 2024

Talwinder Singh v. Sukhjinder Kaur & Anr.

CRM-M No. 23508 of 2018NIDHI GUPTA

Case at a glance

Order date
06 Nov 2024
Bench
NIDHI GUPTA

Provisions considered

Judgment

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: Mr. Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner through V.C. **** NIDHI GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of order dated 04.07.2017 (Annexure P-7) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh Comp-125CRPC/314/2016 titled as “Sukhjinder Kaur and another vs. Talwinder Singh” whereby petitioner has been directed to pay interim maintenace of Rs.4,000/-p.m. (Rs.3,000/- p.m. to respondent No.1 and Rs.1,000/-p.m. to respondent No.2.); AND order dated 17.01.2018 (Annexure P-8) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh whereby order dated 04.07.2017 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, U.T., Chandigarh, has been upheld. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw present petition. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn.

06.11.2024 Divyanshi (NIDHI GUPTA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No DIVYANSHI 2024.11.07 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 06 Nov 2024. The bench was NIDHI GUPTA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM-M No. 23508 of 2018). ← Search more judgments