AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.64368-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 19 v. State of Punjab & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 292, 506
- Information and Technology Act, 2000 s. 67
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ...RESPONDENTS Present: Mr. H.P.S.Ghuman, Advocate, for the petitioner. ... The petitioner has filed this petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.13 dated 17.1.2006 registered under Sections 292/506 IPC and Section 67 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000 at P.S.Division No.1, Jalandhar. This is second petition for quashing of the FIR. The earlier one was dismissed by this Court on 11.8.2006. No fresh ground for quashing of the FIR is made out. Dismissed. October 19, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 292, 506; Information and Technology Act, 2000 — s. 67.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 19 Oct 2006. The bench was SATISH KUMAR MITTAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.