November 28 v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT * * * Mr.L.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.K.S.Sidhu, DAG., Punjab. M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). Petitioner is married sister-in-law of complainant Suman. She having joined investigation can be granted the concession of pre-arrest bail. Order dated 01.09.2011, is hereby made absolute subject to all the conditions under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.. November 28, 2011. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE . . .1
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 28 Nov 2011. The bench was M M S BEDI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.