Suyog Vasdev and others v. State of Haryana & Ors.

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana. , Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2. Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral) **** Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. , quashing of FIR No.0125 dated 26.08.2024, A, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Police under Sections 323, 406, 498-A, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Police A, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Police under Section Station Women Women, West Gurugram, District Gurugram and all subsequent , West Gurugram, District Gurugram, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of proceedings arising

22.01.2026 therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 22.01.2026 Sections 323 and 506 IPC were said to be arrived at between the parties. Sections 323 and 506 IPC were Sections 323 and 506 IPC were said to be arrived at between the parties. deleted from the FIR during investigation. deleted from the FIR during investigation.

2. , this Court directed the parties to appear before On 09.04.2026, this Court directed the parties to appear before , this Court directed the parties to appear before Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with learned trial regard to compromise. regard to compromise.

3. of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before In compliance of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before of the aforesaid order, parties appeared before learned Judicial Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram tement Gurugram, on 18.04.2026. Statement ASI Suman, Belt No.665/GGM, Police Station of Investigating officer- ASI Suman, Belt No.665/GGM, Police Station ASI Suman, Belt No.665/GGM, Police Station of Investigating Women West, Gurugram, , was recorded on Women West, Gurugram Judicial on 22.04.2026. Learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram, has submitted Magistrate Ist report recording has submitted his report recording CRM-M-12607 12607-2026 (O&M) (O&M) 2 satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without satisfaction that all the parties have entered into a valid compromise without any influence or coercion. The relevant part of the report any influence or coercion. as under has been The relevant part of the report as under has been submitted: There are five accused in the present FIR. “i.) There are five accused in the present FIR. ii.) Yes, accused persons are physically present before the Yes, accused persons are physically present before the court and have given their statement in my presence. court and have given their statement in my presence. No, additional accused has been added in the present FIR iii.) No, additional accused has been added in the present FIR No, additional accused has been added in the present FIR and no other person is party to the compromise. and no other person is party to the compromise. iv.) No, accused persons have not been declared as No, accused persons have not been declared as No, accused persons have not been declared as d offender or are absconding in this/any other d offender or are absconding in this/any other proclaimed offender or are absconding in this/any other case. v.) Yes, offence under Section 323 & 506 were deleted Yes, offence under Section 323 & 506 were deleted Yes, offence under Section 323 & 506 were deleted during investigation after the registration of the present during investigation after the registration of the present during investigation after the registration of the present FIR. vi.) Yes, during investigation Sanjeev and Dimple have been Yes, during investigation Sanjeev and Dimple have been Yes, during investigation Sanjeev and Dimple have been declared as innocent. vii.) The name of he complainant is Bhawna daughter of The name of he complainant is Bhawna daughter of The name of he complainant is Bhawna daughter of Mohan Lal. viii.) Yes, the complainant has appeared and gave her Yes, the complainant has appeared and gave her Yes, the complainant has appeared and gave her statement in support of the compromise. statement in support of the compromise. Yes, I have appeared before trial court and my statement ix.) Yes, I have appeared before trial court and my statement Yes, I have appeared before trial court and my statement has been recorded. x.) The trial is at the stage of prosecution evidence, pending trial is at the stage of prosecution evidence, pending trial is at the stage of prosecution evidence, pending before the Trial court. xi.) The compromise, as stated by the parties, is genuine, The compromise, as stated by the parties, is genuine, The compromise, as stated by the parties, is genuine, voluntarily made with free will of the parties. voluntarily made with free will of the parties. xii.) No, criminal case is pending against the accused. No, criminal case is pending against the accused.”

4. and learned counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel and learned counsel for respondent No.2 and learned counsel for respondent No.2 not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the have not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the not raised any dispute regarding the factum of compromise. Since the matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings matter has been amicably resolved, continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. The dispute which has its genesis in a would be an exercise in futility. The dispute which has its genesis in a would be an exercise in futility. The dispute which has its genesis in a would be an exercise in futility. The dispute which has its genesis in a CRM-M-12607 12607-2026 (O&M) (O&M) 3 matrimonial discord, warrants exercise of powers under Section matrimonial discord, warrants exercis 528 of e of powers under Section 528 of BNSS.

5. Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench Following principles of law laid down by the Full Bench “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab Judgment of this Court in “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab Judgment of this Court in and Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and another” 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 “Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others” “Gian Singh , the Versus State of Punjab and others” (2012) 10 SCC 303, the petition is allowed. petition is allowed.

6. FIR No.0125 dated 26.08.2024, under Sections Consequently, FIR No.0125 dated 26.08.2024, under Sections FIR No.0125 dated 26.08.2024, under Sections 406, 498-A and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Women Police Station, West A and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Women Police Station, West and 34 of Indian Penal Code, Women Police Station, West Gurugram, District Gurugram, and all consequen Gurugram, District Gurugram, tial proceedings arising and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are quashed qua the petitioners, on the basis of therefrom, are quashed qua the compromise dated , on the basis of compromise dated

22.01.2026.

7. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE

26.05.2026 Kapil Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable : Yes/No Yes/No